Primary study · included by 1 review

A comparison of two-dimensional prediction tracing and a virtual reality patient methods for diagnosis and treatment planning of orthognathic cases in dental students: a randomized preliminary study

Sakowitz 2020 · Sakowitz Scott M., Inglehart Marita R., Ramaswamy Vidya, et al. · Virtual Reality · 2019

Included by

Haptic technology in orthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Sakowitz 2020 · Table 4; Figure 5; References 19-27
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Skill acquisition, accuracy and planning performance (Hedges g, composite across studies)
Haptic or virtual reality technology vs Conventional methods or no haptic technology
SMD 1.40 [0.82, 1.98]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Skill acquisition, accuracy and planning performance (Hedges g, composite across studies)
Haptic or virtual reality technology vs Conventional methods or no haptic technology
SMD 1.29 [0.48, 2.10]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Skill acquisition, accuracy and planning performance (Hedges g, composite across studies)
Haptic or virtual reality technology vs Conventional methods or no haptic technology
SMD 1.37 [1.32, 1.43]9 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.