evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

What diagnostic strategy performs better for caries lesion detection on proximal surfaces of adolescents?

Moriyama 2021 · Moriyama Caroline M., Novaes Tatiane F., Ferreira Fernanda R., et al. · Clinical Oral Investigations · 2021

Included by

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of laser fluorescence and conventional caries detection methods in children: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Non-Cochrane · DTA · 2026 · cited as Moriyama 2021 · Table 2; reference 32; Results meta-analysis
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pooled sensitivity
Laser fluorescence devices (DIAGNOdent, DIAGNOdent Pen) vs Reference standard (histological, operative, temporary tooth separation, or combined visual and radiographic assessment)
Sensitivity 0.81 [0.77, 0.85]10 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.