Primary study · included by 1 review
Proximal carious lesions infiltration—a 3-year follow-up study of a randomized controlled clinical trial
Arthur 2018 · Arthur Rodrigo Alex, Zenkner Julio Eduardo, d’Ornellas Pereira Júnior Jose Carlos, et al. · Clinical Oral Investigations · 2017
doi:10.1007/s00784-017-2135-xjournal-article
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up | OR 0.21 [0.15, 0.30] | 11 studies · 549 participants | Moderate |
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up | OR 0.24 [0.08, 0.72] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up | OR 0.20 [0.10, 0.39] | 3 studies | Ungraded |
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up | OR 0.32 [0.01, 8.27] | 1 study | Ungraded |
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up | OR 0.14 [0.05, 0.37] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up | OR 0.38 [0.18, 0.81] | 1 study | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.