Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42824404

Clinical Performance of Posterior Tooth-Supported Cantilevered Prostheses With a Follow-Up of ≥ 3 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ghorbani Pardis, Atieh Momen A, Elbishari Haitham, et al. · International journal of dentistry · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1155/ijod/9315051

Findings

25 findings

Population
Adults with one missing posterior tooth receiving single-retainer tooth-supported cantilever fixed dental prosthesesPosterior tooth-supported cantilever prosthesisNoneAnnual failure
All follow-up
Incidence rate 1.62 [1.13, 2.32]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
3 years (estimated) · Premolar-replacing C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 96.24
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 256 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
5 years (estimated) · Mesial-cantilever C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 100
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 21 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
5 years (estimated) · Maxillary C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 93.89
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 146 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
3 years (estimated) · Mandibular C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 96.29
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 136 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis failure
Mean follow-up 5.30 years · Maxillary C-FDPs
Incidence rate 1.43 [0.74, 2.74]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 146 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
5 years (estimated) · Mandibular C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 93.89
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 136 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
5 years (estimated) · Premolar-replacing C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 93.82
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 256 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis failure
Mean follow-up 5.03 years · Premolar-replacing C-FDPs
Incidence rate 1.43 [0.93, 2.21]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 256 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis failure
Mean follow-up 5.44 years · Molar-replacing C-FDPs
Incidence rate 2.84 [1.32, 6.13]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 41 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis failure
Mean follow-up 4.67 years
Proportion (%) 8.0
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 351 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
3 years (estimated) · Molar-replacing C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 94.49
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 41 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
3 years (estimated) · Maxillary C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 96.29
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 146 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
3 years (estimated) · Studies with at least 3-year follow-up
Survival rate (%) 95.57
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 236 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
5 years (estimated) · Distal-cantilever C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 100
GRADE not reported
1 study · 5 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis failure
Mean follow-up 4.67 years
Annual failure rate 1.43
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 351 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
5 years (estimated) · Studies with at least 5-year follow-up
Survival rate (%) 93.45
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 115 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
3 years (estimated) · Distal-cantilever C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 100
GRADE not reported
1 study · 5 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis failure
Mean follow-up 4.84 years · Mandibular C-FDPs
Incidence rate 1.54 [0.77, 3.08]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 136 participants
Adults with one missing posterior tooth receiving single-retainer tooth-supported cantilever fixed dental prosthesesPosterior tooth-supported cantilever prosthesisNoneAnnual failure
At least 5 years
Incidence rate 1.44 [0.86, 2.4]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
5 years (estimated) · Molar-replacing C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 90.98
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 41 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis (C-FDP)None (single-arm)Prosthesis survival
3 years (estimated) · Mesial-cantilever C-FDPs
Survival rate (%) 100
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 21 participants
Adults with one missing posterior tooth receiving single-retainer tooth-supported cantilever fixed dental prosthesesPosterior tooth-supported cantilever prosthesisNoneAnnual failure
At least 3 years
Incidence rate 1.82 [1.1, 3.02]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothPremolar-replacing tooth-supported C-FDPMolar-replacing tooth-supported C-FDPProsthesis failure
Follow-up 3.00 to 9.43 years
RR 0.74 [0.30, 1.86]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 257 participants
Adults with a single missing posterior (premolar or molar) toothMaxillary tooth-supported C-FDPMandibular tooth-supported C-FDPProsthesis failure
Follow-up 3.06 to 9.43 years
RR 0.89 [0.33, 2.37]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 132 participants

Included primary studies 10

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Botelho 2006
A retrospective clinical evaluation of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.
PMID:16803807
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Botelho 2014
Long-term clinical evaluation of 211 two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.
PMID:24685984
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hussey 1996
The clinical performance of cantilevered resin-bonded bridgework.
PMID:8783529
1996this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kasem 2025
Fiber-reinforced composite or zirconia in cantilever fixed dental prosthesis? 36-month follow-up clinical study.
PMID:40120797
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lam 2013
Longevity of implant crowns and 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded bridges.
PMID:23025467
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lam 2024
Posterior two-unit cantilevered zirconia resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A 3-year prospective single-arm clinical trial.
PMID:38901823
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Olsson 2003
A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs.
PMID:12737246
2003this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sailer 2013
Retrospective clinical study of single-retainer cantilever anterior and posterior glass-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses at a…
PMID:23998142
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shahdad 2018
Clinical Evaluation of All Ceramic Zirconia Framework Resin Bonded Bridges.
PMID:30398816
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yazigi 2022
Clinical evaluation of zirconia cantilevered single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses replacing missing canines and posterior…
PMID:34838845
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationHuman adults of any gender with a single missing premolar or molar tooth requiring replacement with a tooth-supported C-FDPPatients with 380 posterior C-FDPs (319 premolar, 61 molar; 181 maxillary, 162 mandibular) (n=10)
InterventionSingle tooth-supported C-FDP with a single retainer of any design (conventional or resin-bonded) and materialPosterior tooth-supported single-retainer C-FDPs, mostly resin-bonded (metal, PFM, zirconia, glass-ceramic, alumina, fiber-reinforced composite) (n=10)
ComparisonPremolar vs molar, maxillary vs mandibular, and mesial vs distal tooth-supported C-FDPsPremolar vs molar (n=6; RR from 5); maxillary vs mandibular (n=5; RR from 3); mesial vs distal (n=2; no failures, not estimable)
OutcomesPrimary: survival rate of prostheses; secondary: incidence of biological and mechanical complicationsFailure rate and estimated survival (n=8 in meta-analysis); biological complications (n=5, narrative); mechanical complications (n=5, narrative)
Study designsRandomized, nonrandomized, observational and cohort clinical studies; English language5 retrospective, 4 prospective (1 randomized), 1 observational cohort (n=10)
TimingMinimum observation period of 3 years; estimated 3- and 5-year survivalFollow-up 36.0 to 115.2 months; estimated 3- and 5-year survival

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoPartial Yesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: No · NRSI: NoNRSI: No · RCT: Nono
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: No · NRSI: NoNRSI: No · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes