Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42782998

Clinical Outcomes of Sequential Distalization with Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Baxmann Martin, Zsoldos Márton, Kárpáti Krisztina · Dentistry journal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/dj14090611

Findings

Population Adolescents or adults undergoing sequential distalization

10 findings

Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Maxillary second-molar distal tippingMEAN 5.77 [-6.84, 18.38]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Maxillary first-molar distalizationMEAN 1.72 [1.02, 2.42]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
7 studies
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Mandibular first-molar distalizationMEAN 1.87 [-0.32, 4.06]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
3 studies
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Mandibular second-molar distalizationMEAN 1.96 [-2.06, 5.97]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
2 studies
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Maxillary first-molar distalization
Participant-level estimates only; sensitivity analysis
MEAN 2.07 [1.04, 3.10]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Maxillary first-molar distal tippingMEAN 5.33 [1.37, 9.30]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Maxillary first-molar intrusionMEAN 0.58 [0.05, 1.10]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Maxillary second-molar distalization
Participant-level estimates only; sensitivity analysis
MEAN 1.96 [0.64, 3.28]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Maxillary second-molar distalizationMEAN 1.76 [1.12, 2.40]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
6 studies
Sequential distalization with clear alignersNo comparator (single-group pooled mean)Maxillary second-molar intrusionMEAN 0.67 [-1.14, 2.48]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies

Included primary studies 28

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Al-Tayar 2023
Impact of molar teeth distalization by clear aligners on temporomandibular joint: a three-dimensional study.
PMID:37455279
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Al-Worafi 2024a
Impact of molar teeth distalization by clear aligners on maxillary alveolar bone thickness and root resorption: a three‑dimensional study.
PMID:38355506
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Al-Worafi 2024b
Effect of maxillary molars distalization using clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances on the positional and dimensional…
PMID:39538283
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Balboni 2023
Vertical effects of distalization protocol with Clear aligners in Class II patients: a prospective study.
PMID:37162331
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Caruso 2019
Impact of molar teeth distalization with clear aligners on occlusal vertical dimension: a retrospective study.
PMID:31409348
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
D'Anto 2023
Predictability of Maxillary Molar Distalization and Derotation with Clear Aligners: A Prospective Study.
PMID:36833638
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Elfouly 2023
Does maxillary sinus proximity affect molar root resorption during distalization using Invisalign? a CBCT study.
PMID:37990186
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Elfouly 2024
Tip, torque and rotation of maxillary molars during distalization using Invisalign: a CBCT study.
PMID:39009996
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hatami 2026
Treatment outcomes of Class II subdivision with clear aligners: A retrospective study.
PMID:41182199
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Keilig 2024
Accuracy of Digital Orthodontic Treatment Planning: Assessing Aligner-Directed Tooth Movements and Exploring Inherent Intramaxillary Side…
PMID:38673571
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lin 2023
Treatment of class II malocclusion with Invisalign®: A pilot study using digital model-integrated maxillofacial cone beam computed…
PMID:36643222
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lione 2022
Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized…
PMID:36217134
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Liu 2024
Miniscrew anchorage versus Class II elastics for maxillary arch distalization using clear aligners.
PMID:39229948
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Liu 2025
Maxillary molar distalization with invisalign in adult patients: a preliminary study using iTero-created digital models.
PMID:40702438
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Loberto 2023
Anchorage Loss Evaluation during Maxillary Molars Distalization Performed by Clear Aligners: A Retrospective Study on 3D Digital Casts
DOI:10.3390/app13063646
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maksyukov 2026
Evaluation of the effectiveness of maxillary molar distalization using clear aligners in combination with micro-implants: a randomized…
DOI:10.17816/dent702551
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mamani 2024
Effectiveness of Clear Aligners on Sequential Maxillary Molar Distalization: Discrepancy between Treatment Goal and Outcome.
PMID:39064256
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Miao 2023
Influence of maxillary molar distalization with clear aligners on three-dimensional direction: molar distal movement, intrusion, distal…
PMID:38151662
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Qiang 2025
Accuracy of maxillary molar distalization with clear aligners in three-dimension: a retrospective study based on CBCT superimposition.
PMID:39964527
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ravera 2016
Maxillary molar distalization with aligners in adult patients: a multicenter retrospective study.
PMID:27041551
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rongo 2022
Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients: What Are the Effects of the Intermaxillary Elastics with Clear Aligners? A Retrospective Single…
PMID:36555949
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saif 2026
Molar distalization and stability following maxillary anterior teeth alignment with class II elastics and a 10-day aligner protocol.
PMID:41775797
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shen 2026
Maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner therapy and infrazygomatic temporary skeletal anchorage devices.
PMID:41105056
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Simon 2014
Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique--regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization.
PMID:24923279
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2024
Comparison of treatment effects between clear aligners and fixed appliances in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization.
PMID:38733349
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wu 2021
Efficacy of mandibular molar distalization by clear aligner treatment.
PMID:34911842
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yurdakul 2024
Evaluating anchorage loss in upper incisors during distalization of maxillary posterior teeth using clear aligners in adult patients: A…
PMID:38533599
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhao 2026
Soft tissue and dentoskeletal changes associated with mandibular molar distalization using clear aligner therapy: a retrospective…
PMID:41974799
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdolescents or adults undergoing sequential distalization with clear aligners for Class II or selected Class III malocclusionsAdolescents and adults, mostly Class II (including Class II subdivision), few selected Class III or mandibular crowding; samples of 7 to 46 participants (n=28 studies)
InterventionSequential distalization using any commercially available clear aligner system, with or without adjunctive biomechanics (TADs, Class II elastics, attachments)Sequential maxillary molar distalization with clear aligners (mostly Invisalign), with Class II elastics, miniscrews/TADs or no auxiliary anchorage; mandibular molar distalization (V-pattern) in few studies
ComparisonAlternative distalization protocols, different anchorage strategies, different aligner systems, fixed appliances, or no comparatorMostly no comparator (single-group); comparators in some studies: fixed appliances (n=2), pendulum appliance (n=1), Class II elastics vs miniscrew/micro-implant anchorage (n=2), 33% vs 50% sequencing (n=1), staging/anchorage strategies (n=1), with vs without auxiliaries (n=1)
OutcomesPrimary: amount of posterior tooth distalization. Secondary: anchorage preservation, movement predictability, vertical changes, treatment duration, root resorption, periodontal outcomes, treatment stability, adverse events, patient-reported outcomesPooled: maxillary first/second molar distalization, distal tipping and intrusion; mandibular first/second molar distalization. Narrative: predictability/accuracy, anchorage loss, torque/rotation, root resorption, alveolar bone, TMJ, treatment duration, refinements, stability, soft tissue
Study designsRCTs, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, comparative clinical studies, observational clinical studies3 RCTs, 3 nonrandomized comparative studies, 22 uncontrolled single-group clinical studies (n=28)
TimingNot specifiedPost-distalization, post-treatment and planned-versus-achieved assessments; distalization phase about 4 to 11 months, comprehensive treatment about 33 to 34 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalYesPartial Yesno
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: YesRCT: Yes · NRSI: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: NoNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/Ano
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesNono
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes