Non-Cochrane · prognostic · PM42782538

Incidental findings from panoramic radiographs: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Imboden-Ilia Anastasia, Awaad Heba, Inglezos Emmanouil, et al. · Clinical oral investigations · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s00784-026-07148-4

Findings

Population Dental patients receiving panoramic radiographs

77 findings

Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSinus; opacityPrevalence (%) 1.57 [1.12, 2.19]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 2108 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneEnamel pearlPrevalence (%) 0.85 [0.17, 4.10]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 4897 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneTranspositionPrevalence (%) 0.15 [0.03, 0.81]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 48453 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneRoot resorptionPrevalence (%) 0.85 [0.39, 1.83]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 12581 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneOsteosynthesis materialPrevalence (%) 1.05 [0.83, 1.32]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 6502 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAmelogenesis imperfectaPrevalence (%) 0.13 [0.02, 0.75]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 46650 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSinus; hypoplasiaPrevalence (%) 0.19 [0.09, 0.39]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 3743 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCementoblastomaPrevalence (%) 0.43 [0.19, 0.96]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1386 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Sensitivity analysis: study sample size 1001–2000 patients
Prevalence (%) 35.80 [5.82, 83.40]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: tooth shape anomalyPrevalence (%) 2.85 [0.39, 18.06]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 45470 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Visiting public health clinic
Prevalence (%) 33.60 [10.24, 69.18]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1488 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Sensitivity analysis: study sample size 0–200 patients
Prevalence (%) 58.40 [39.33, 75.26]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneOsseous lesionPrevalence (%) 2.19 [0.19, 20.62]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1022 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCalcification; vascular plaquePrevalence (%) 3.65 [2.93, 4.54]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 2108 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCalcification; sialolithPrevalence (%) 0.20 [0.03, 1.39]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 10116 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneHypercementosisPrevalence (%) 1.43 [0.35, 5.69]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1033 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Seeking pedodontic treatment
Prevalence (%) 16.76 [14.91, 18.78]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 1432 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental findingPrevalence (%) 36.70 [22.90, 53.08]
GRADE not reported
19 studies · 61627 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneRadiolucencyPrevalence (%) 3.65 [0.20, 41.77]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 6953 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: airway findingsPrevalence (%) 30.86 [2.16, 90.03]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 3120 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSinus; inflammationPrevalence (%) 0.52 [0.09, 3.07]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 2539 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Children
Prevalence (%) 52.71 [28.80, 75.43]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 2676 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneTooth ectopiaPrevalence (%) 0.25 [0.09, 0.70]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 48495 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNonePeriapical lesion / rarefying osteitisPrevalence (%) 5.32 [1.37, 18.48]
GRADE not reported
9 studies · 6618 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
3rd molar extraction
Prevalence (%) 53.72 [44.81, 62.40]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 121 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneTalon cuspPrevalence (%) 0.17 [0.03, 1.05]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 46448 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSinus; mucosal thickeningPrevalence (%) 2.54 [0.78, 7.99]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 3307 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneDense bone island / osteosclerosisPrevalence (%) 3.91 [1.70, 8.73]
GRADE not reported
9 studies · 12832 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCyst; bonePrevalence (%) 0.51 [0.11, 2.27]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1856 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneDens invaginatusPrevalence (%) 0.11 [0.02, 0.54]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 47623 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: vertebrae findingsPrevalence (%) 7.41 [0.34, 65.11]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1364 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCondyle; hyperplasiaPrevalence (%) 0.32 [0.16, 0.63]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 2539 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCalcification; tonsilolithPrevalence (%) 2.68 [0.98, 7.12]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 10116 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneRadiopacityPrevalence (%) 7.14 [3.22, 15.11]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 8030 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Seeking dental treatment
Prevalence (%) 50.37 [17.27, 83.14]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 53732 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCalcification; carotid arteryPrevalence (%) 1.00 [0.18, 5.48]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1558 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Sensitivity analysis: study sample size 201–500 patients
Prevalence (%) 20.70 [4.51, 59.08]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneRetained rootPrevalence (%) 5.27 [0.33, 48.00]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 3288 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Meta-regression: Male %
Meta-regression coefficient -0.46 [-1.50, 0.58]
GRADE not reported
16 studies
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCyst; radicularPrevalence (%) 0.41 [0.07, 2.58]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 2480 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Patients referred for temporomandibular joint disorders
Prevalence (%) 88.3 [77.5, 94.3]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 60 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: sinus findingsPrevalence (%) 8.22 [3.06, 20.25]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 4826 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneHypodontiaPrevalence (%) 4.45 [2.37, 8.21]
GRADE not reported
11 studies · 59943 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Meta-regression: Age
Meta-regression coefficient 0.10 [-0.41, 0.61]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Edentulous patients
Prevalence (%) 38.5 [23.5, 56.1]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Adults
Prevalence (%) 83.11 [48.12, 96.31]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1532 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneNasal septum deviationPrevalence (%) 2.74 [0.01, 91.01]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1854 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: tooth number anomalyPrevalence (%) 6.13 [1.38, 23.37]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 44461 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneMacrodontiaPrevalence (%) 0.07 [0, 10.41]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 47299 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneFusion/geminationPrevalence (%) 0.03 [0, 0.17]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 47623 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: soft-tissue calcificationsPrevalence (%) 9.41 [4.14, 19.99]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 3070 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneRetained toothPrevalence (%) 3.39 [1.30, 8.55]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 350 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSinus; pneumatizationPrevalence (%) 50.64 [32.63, 68.49]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 1887 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: dental findingsPrevalence (%) 12.19 [1.54, 55.23]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 9642 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneForeign bodyPrevalence (%) 1.02 [0.22, 4.56]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 904 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCalcification; styloid ligament (/elongation)Prevalence (%) 7.12 [0.99, 36.94]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 7472 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneOdontomaPrevalence (%) 0.42 [0.20, 0.87]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 4966 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCyst; dentigerousPrevalence (%) 0.73 [0.16, 3.25]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 10240 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneImpactionPrevalence (%) 10.53 [3.56, 27.29]
GRADE not reported
11 studies · 58650 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: TMJ findingPrevalence (%) 1.77 [0.50, 6.15]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 4876 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSinus; mucous retention (pseudo)cystPrevalence (%) 1.87 [0.48, 6.93]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 11502 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneRoot dilacerationPrevalence (%) 1.51 [0.31, 6.99]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 8885 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneOligodontiaPrevalence (%) 0.04 [0.03, 0.07]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 45636 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCondyle; degenerative joint diseasePrevalence (%) 0.11 [0.03, 0.43]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 1877 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCalcification; pulpPrevalence (%) 3.24 [0.71, 13.54]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 1133 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneMarginal bone lossPrevalence (%) 6.13 [0.11, 79.58]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 4667 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneSummary: tooth position anomalyPrevalence (%) 11.68 [3.49, 32.56]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 44874 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneMicrodontiaPrevalence (%) 1.10 [0.67, 1.80]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 49034 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Seeking orthodontic treatment
Prevalence (%) 38.98 [20.88, 60.73]
GRADE not reported
9 studies · 4980 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCalcification; antrolithPrevalence (%) 0.06 [0.01, 0.58]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 3743 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneTurbinate hypertrophyPrevalence (%) 6.98 [0.13, 81.75]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 2637 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Sensitivity analysis: study sample size 501–1000 patients
Prevalence (%) 46.28 [13.41, 82.73]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneTaurodontismPrevalence (%) 1.00 [0.21, 4.63]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 50668 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneOsteitis condensans / sclerosing osteitisPrevalence (%) 1.64 [0.82, 3.23]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 7035 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneHyperdontiaPrevalence (%) 1.34 [0.90, 2.00]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 58836 participants
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneAt least one incidental finding
Sensitivity analysis: study sample size >2000 patients
Prevalence (%) 13.82 [0, 99.96]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Diagnostic panoramic radiographyNoneCemento-osseous dysplasia (periapical)Prevalence (%) 0.57 [0.02, 13.69]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 3263 participants

Included primary studies 25

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Aikins 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Al-Abdallah 2015
Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies: a comparison between maxillary and mandibular tooth agenesis.
PMID:26522039
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Almeida 2024
The use of panoramic radiographs to address the oral health needs of vulnerable Canadian populations.
PMID:38505315
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bondemark 2006
Incidental findings of pathology and abnormality in pretreatment orthodontic panoramic radiographs.
PMID:16448276
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Büyükgöze-Dindar 2022
Prevalence of Dental Anomalies Assessed Using Panoramic Radiographs in a Sample of the Turkish Population.
PMID:36102888
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cral 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
da Silva Dias 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Edmonds 2025
Ability of Orthodontists to Detect, Interpret and Propose Management Strategies for Incidental Findings on Pre-Treatment Panoramic…
PMID:39776310
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Escolano Rivas 2018
Frecuencia, hallazgos y variaciones óseas en radiografías panorámicas de personas con edentulismo total
DOI:10.11144/javeriana.uo37-78.fchv
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hernández 2018
Incidental findings in pre-orthodontic treatment radiographs.
PMID:29607488
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hlongwa 2023
Incidental Pathologic Findings from Orthodontic Pretreatment Panoramic Radiographs.
PMID:36834172
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Imanimoghaddam 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Indra 2020
Analysis of Panoramic Images of Orthodontic Patients
DOI:10.26452/ijrps.v11ispl3.3507
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jadu 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jiménez Ortíz 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Karkac 2024
Determining the Incidental Pathologic Findings (IPFs) on panoramic radiographs before orthodontic treatments: A retrospective study
DOI:10.5937/bjdm2402091k
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Leyva Altamirano 2011
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
MacDonald 2020
Incidental findings in a consecutive series of digital panoramic radiographs.
PMID:32206621
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mohan 2024
Prescription of panoramic radiographs in children using age-based prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies.
PMID:37330621
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pakbaznejad Esmaeili 2016
Type and location of findings in dental panoramic tomographs in 7-12-year-old orthodontic patients.
PMID:26634313
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pamadya 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sadik 2020
Complete Edentulism of Dental Patients in Northeastern Turkey: Prevalence and Radiographic Findings on Panoramic Radiographs Prevalence…
DOI:10.14693/jdi.v27i3.1139
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Temur 2021
Incidental dental anomalies and jawbone pathologies in Turkish pediatric patients of the Eastern Mediterranean region
DOI:10.4328/acam.20726
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Vaiciulis 2020
Occurrence of Nonarticular Incidental Findings on Panoramic Radiographs in Painful Temporomandibular Disorders
DOI:10.4067/s0718-381x2020000200213
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yoga 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients of any age, sex, or ethnicity with any anamnestic or clinical justification for a diagnostic panoramic radiographDental patients (n=25 studies; 66,882 patients; 44.1% male): seeking orthodontic treatment (n=11), dental treatment (n=6), pedodontic treatment (n=2), radiology referral (n=2), other reasons
InterventionPanoramic radiograph for diagnostic imaging of the head/neck region (exposure)Panoramic radiographs (n=25)
ComparisonComparisons according to patient characteristicsSubgroups by sample origin and patient age group; meta-regression by mean age and % male
OutcomesAny incidental finding from panoramic radiographs; prevalence of specific findings, alone or as categorized by study authorsAny incidental finding (n=19 studies, 61,627 patients); 60 specific findings or categories pooled (2 to 13 studies each); 5 findings from single studies not pooled
Study designsLongitudinal or cross-sectional studies (prospective or retrospective) on humansCross-sectional studies (n=25)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified