Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42769674

Comparison of selective amygdalohippocampectomy and anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Barone Vinícius, Pires de Aguiar Paulo Henrique · Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1016/j.ebr.2026.100869

Findings

Population Patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

10 findings

Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomyPoor seizure outcome (Engel III–IV)
1 year · Random effects model
RR 1.28 [0.98, 1.69]
GRADE not reported
14 studies · 1878 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomyVisual field defects on Goldmann perimetry
Postoperative; variable follow-up · Common effect model
RR 0.85 [0.73, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 634 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomyVisual field defects on Goldmann perimetry
Postoperative; variable follow-up · Random effects model
RR 0.84 [0.78, 0.92]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 634 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomyPostoperative complications
Postoperative; variable follow-up · Random effects model
RR 0.60 [0.30, 1.23]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 928 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomySeizure freedom (Engel I)
1 year where available · Random effects model
RR 0.96 [0.89, 1.02]
GRADE not reported
19 studies · 2235 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomyPostoperative complications
Postoperative; variable follow-up · Common effect model
RR 0.62 [0.47, 0.83]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 928 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomyDecline in verbal memory performance (RAVLT)
Postoperative; variable follow-up · Random effects model
RR 0.80 [0.39, 1.63]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 875 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomySeizure freedom (Engel I)
1 year where available · Common effect model
RR 0.92 [0.87, 0.97]
GRADE not reported
19 studies · 2235 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomyDecline in verbal memory performance (RAVLT)
Postoperative; variable follow-up · Common effect model
RR 0.76 [0.59, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 875 participants
Selective amygdalohippocampectomyAnterior temporal lobectomyPoor seizure outcome (Engel III–IV)
1 year · Common effect model
RR 1.22 [1.00, 1.50]
GRADE not reported
14 studies · 1878 participants

Included primary studies 22

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Almeida 2023
Surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy: comparative results of selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus anterior temporal lobectomy…
PMID:37494949
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Arruda 1995
Mesial atrophy and outcome after amygdalohippocampectomy or temporal lobe removal.
PMID:8797534
1996this review onlySeizure freedom (Engel I)not extracted yet
Bate 2006
The seizure outcome after amygdalohippocampectomy and temporal lobectomy.
PMID:17222120
2007this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Boucher 2015
Different effects of anterior temporal lobectomy and selective amygdalohippocampectomy on verbal memory performance of patients with…
PMID:26469799
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bujarski 2013
Long-term seizure, cognitive, and psychiatric outcome following trans-middle temporal gyrus amygdalohippocampectomy and standard temporal…
PMID:23621601
2013this review onlySeizure freedom (Engel I)not extracted yet
Clusmann 2002
Prognostic factors and outcome after different types of resection for temporal lobe epilepsy.
PMID:12450036
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Egan 2000
Visual field deficits in conventional anterior temporal lobectomy versus amygdalohippocampectomy.
PMID:11134379
2000this review onlyVisual field defects on Goldmann perimetrynot extracted yet
Elliott 2018
Seizure outcome in pediatric medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus anterior…
PMID:29932370
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lee 1997
Effects of left temporal lobectomy and amygdalohippocampectomy on memory.
PMID:18638976
1997this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mathon 2017
Complications After Surgery for Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Associated with Hippocampal Sclerosis.
PMID:28389411
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mittal 2005
Long-term outcome after surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy in children.
PMID:16302611
2005this review onlySeizure freedom (Engel I)not extracted yet
Morino 2006
Comparison of neuropsychological outcomes after selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus anterior temporal lobectomy.
PMID:16716754
2006this review onlySeizure freedom (Engel I)not extracted yet
Nascimento 2015
Anterior temporal lobectomy versus selective amygdalohippocampectomy in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
PMID:26690840
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Paglioli 2006
Seizure and memory outcome following temporal lobe surgery: selective compared with nonselective approaches for hippocampal sclerosis.
PMID:16509149
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sagher 2012
Seizure outcomes and mesial resection volumes following selective amygdalohippocampectomy and temporal lobectomy.
PMID:22380862
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Schijns 2011
Presence of temporal gray-white matter abnormalities does not influence epilepsy surgery outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy with…
PMID:21150756
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Schmeiser (2) 2017
Visual field defects following different resective procedures for mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy.
PMID:28954709
2017this review onlyVisual field defects on Goldmann perimetrynot extracted yet
Schmeiser 2017
Surgical Treatment of Mesiotemporal Lobe Epilepsy: Which Approach is Favorable?
PMID:28582572
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tanriverdi 2008
Long-term seizure outcome after mesial temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: corticalamygdalohippocampectomy versus selective…
PMID:18312099
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tanriverdi 2010
Memory outcome after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: corticoamygdalohippocampectomy versus selective amygdalohippocampectomy.
PMID:19961307
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2018
Clinical outcomes after medial temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: Anterior temporal lobectomy versus selective amygdalohippocampectomy.
PMID:30110006
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wendling 2013
Selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus standard temporal lobectomy in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and unilateral…
PMID:23022178
2013this review onlySeizure freedom (Engel I)not extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (drug-resistant)Patients with MTLE (n=2,482; 1,275 ATL and 1,207 SAH)
InterventionSelective amygdalohippocampectomySAH, transsylvian or transcortical (n=22 studies)
ComparisonAnterior temporal lobectomyATL, standard anteromesial resection (n=22 studies)
OutcomesSeizure freedom (Engel I, primary); Engel III-IV outcome; neuropsychological performance; postoperative complications; visual field defects (Goldmann)Seizure freedom (n=19); Engel III-IV (n=14); RAVLT verbal memory decline (n=5); postoperative complications (n=4); Goldmann visual field defects (n=3)
Study designsRandomized or non-randomized comparative cohort studies; no language or date limitsRetrospective and prospective cohort studies; no RCTs (n=22)
TimingSeizure outcomes at 1 year (longest available if < 1 year); other outcomes as reportedMean follow-up 12 months to 10 years; seizure outcomes at 1 year

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalNoNoyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesNono
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailNoYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: YesRCT: N/A · NRSI: Yesyes
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: NoRCT: N/A · NRSI: Noyes
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoYesno
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes