Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42694976

Efficacy of advanced treatment modalities of dentin hypersensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saxena Vrinda, Shoukath Saina, Saxena Payal, et al. · Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2026.101500

Findings

17 findings

Population
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityAdvanced treatment modalitiesConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scoresSMD -0.99 [-1.28, -0.71]
GRADE not reported
2888 participants
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityAdvanced treatment modalitiesConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scoresSMD -1.02 [-1.32, -0.73]
GRADE not reported
25 studies · 2721 participants
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityIontophoresisConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Iontophoresis
SMD -1.25 [-1.92, -0.57]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityLaser therapyConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Laser therapy
SMD -1.66 [-2.73, -0.59]
GRADE not reported
264 participants
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityLaser therapyConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Laser therapy
SMD -2.11 [-2.96, -1.26]
GRADE not reported
16 studies
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityCalcium phosphate-based agentsConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Calcium phosphate-based agents
SMD -0.72 [-1.09, -0.34]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityCalcium phosphate-based agentsConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Calcium phosphate-based agents
SMD -0.54 [-0.91, -0.16]
GRADE not reported
429 participants
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityOxalate-based agentsConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Oxalate-based agents
SMD -0.40 [-0.92, 0.12]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with clinically diagnosed dentin hypersensitivity of permanent teethArginine-based formulationsPlacebo, sham, no treatment or conventional desensitizing agentsDentin hypersensitivity reduction (VAS, Schiff or verbal rating scores)
Follow-up of at least 1 month; time points not separated · Dental clinics · Subgroup 1.1.8 Arginine, Figure 3
SMD -0.98 [-1.57, -0.39]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 50 participants
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityArginine-calcium carbonate formulationsConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Arginine-calcium carbonate formulations
SMD -1.04 [-1.37, -0.72]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityBioactive glassConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Bioactive glass
SMD -1.08 [-2.08, -0.09]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 233 participants
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityNanoparticle-based agentsConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Nanoparticle-based agents
SMD -0.87 [-1.50, -0.25]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityResin and varnish systemsConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Resin and varnish systems
SMD 0.14 [-0.40, 0.68]
GRADE not reported
129 participants
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityResin and varnish systemsConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Resin and varnish systems
SMD 0.50 [-0.22, 1.23]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with dentin hypersensitivityFluoride gelConventional or placebo controls; varied by trialDentin hypersensitivity pain scores
Fluoride gel
SMD -1.16 [-1.56, -0.76]
GRADE not reported
1783 participants
Adults with clinically diagnosed dentin hypersensitivity of permanent teethPotassium salt (subgroup 1.1.3 in Figure 3)Placebo, sham, no treatment or conventional desensitizing agentsDentin hypersensitivity reduction (VAS, Schiff or verbal rating scores)
Follow-up of at least 1 month; time points not separated · Dental clinics · Subgroup 1.1.3 Potasium salt, Figure 3: not estimable
Not estimable; no data (0 participants)
No studies found
0 studies
Adults with clinically diagnosed dentin hypersensitivity of permanent teethPlatelet-rich fibrinPlacebo, sham, no treatment or conventional desensitizing agentsDentin hypersensitivity reduction (VAS, Schiff or verbal rating scores)
Follow-up of at least 1 month; time points not separated · Dental clinics · Planned during protocol development
No studies satisfied the predefined eligibility criteria for PRF
No studies found
0 studies

Included primary studies 48

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Jalaluddin et al. 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
AlQahtani 2023
Evaluation of Propolis Hydrogel for the Treatment of Dentinal Sensitivity: A Clinical Study.
PMID:37367153
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
AlQahtani et al. 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Arshad 2021
Comparative efficacy of BioMin-F, Colgate Sensitive Pro-relief and Sensodyne Rapid Action in relieving dentin hypersensitivity: a…
PMID:34615511
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Arshad et al. 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bahal 2019
A randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of an oxalate strip for the management of dentine hypersensitivity pain.
PMID:31150729
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bahal et al. 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barros 2022
Effect of 1.5% potassium oxalate on sensitivity control, color change, and quality of life after at-home tooth whitening: A randomized,…
PMID:36395262
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barros et al. 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Corral 2016
Effect of Oxalic Acid-Based Desensitizing Agent on Cervical Restorations on Hypersensitive Teeth: A Triple-Blind Randomized Controlled…
PMID:27792801
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Corral et al. 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Das 2023
Effect of Iontophoresis on the Effectiveness of Nano-Hydroxyapatite and Pro-argin in In-Office Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A…
PMID:38259360
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ding 2020
Efficacy of nano-carbonate apatite dentifrice in relief from dentine hypersensitivity following non-surgical periodontal therapy: a…
PMID:32532267
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ding et al. 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guney 2011 (Table 1 cites reference 25, Yilmaz 2011)
Clinical evaluation of Er,Cr:YSGG and GaAlAs laser therapy for treating dentine hypersensitivity: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
PMID:21238531
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guney et al. 2011
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hasan 2011 (Table 1 reference 27)
Long-term effect of diode laser irradiation compared to sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in…
PMID:21668343
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hasan et al. 2011
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hatem 2021 (Table 1 reference 26)
A randomized clinical trial of dentin hypersensitivity reduction over one month after a single topical application of comparable materials.
PMID:33762645
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hatem et al. 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ivette 2019
Effect of the casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF) and photobiomodulation (PBM) on dental…
PMID:31790452
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ivette et al. 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jalaluddin 2019
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Different Treatment Modalities in the Management of Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Comparative Study
DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1626
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Matsuura 2022
The efficacy of a novel zinc-containing desensitizer CAREDYNE Shield for cervical dentin hypersensitivity: a pilot randomized controlled…
PMID:35843957
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Matsuura et al. 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Miron 2020
Using Laser-Doppler Flowmetry to Evaluate the Therapeutic Response in Dentin Hypersensitivity.
PMID:33256192
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Miron et al. 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Naghsh 2024
Evaluation of the effects of 980 and 810-nm high-level diode lasers in treating dentin hypersensitivity: A double-blinded randomized…
PMID:36605144
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Naghsh et al. 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Narges 2020
Evaluation of the Effects of 660-nm and 810-nm Low-Level Diode Lasers on the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity.
PMID:32273952
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Narges et al. 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Neuhaus 2013
Effectiveness of a calcium sodium phosphosilicate-containing prophylaxis paste in reducing dentine hypersensitivity immediately and 4…
PMID:23414245
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Neuhaus et al. 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Patil 2015
Evaluation of three different agents for in-office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity: a controlled clinical study.
PMID:25961613
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Patil et al. 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pepelassi 2012
Effectiveness of an in-office arginine-calcium carbonate paste on dentine hypersensitivity in periodontitis patients: a double-blind,…
PMID:25269991
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pepelassi et al. 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Seong 2020
A randomised controlled trial investigating efficacy of a novel toothpaste containing calcium silicate and sodium phosphate in dentine…
PMID:32497553
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Seong et al. 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sharma 2013
Randomised clinical efficacy trial of potassium oxalate mouthrinse in relieving dentinal sensitivity.
PMID:23929644
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sharma et al. 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tevatia 2017
Comparative clinical evaluation of gallium-aluminum-arsenide diode laser and potassium nitrate in treating dentinal hypersensitivity.
PMID:29491586
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tevatia et al. 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Vano 2014
Effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste in reducing dentin hypersensitivity: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
PMID:25019114
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Vano et al. 2014
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yilmaz et al. 2011
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Young Lee 2015
Desensitizing efficacy of nano-carbonate apatite dentifrice and Er,Cr:YSGG laser: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:25594768
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Young Lee et al. 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (18 years or older) with clinically diagnosed dentin hypersensitivity of permanent teethAdults with dentin hypersensitivity (n=2721 in meta-analysis)
InterventionAdvanced modalities: laser therapy, photobiomodulation, bioactive glass, nano-hydroxyapatite, CPP-ACP, iontophoresis, oxalate, arginine, resin and varnish systems, combination therapiesLaser (n=16 studies), resin and varnish (n=4), calcium phosphate (n=3), oxalate (n=3), nanoparticle (n=3), iontophoresis (n=2), arginine (n=2), bioactive glass (n=2)
ComparisonPlacebo, sham, no treatment or conventional desensitizing agentsPlacebo, sham, no treatment or conventional agents
OutcomesReduction in hypersensitivity on validated scales (VAS, Schiff), duration of relief, adverse effectsHypersensitivity score reduction (VAS, Schiff, VRS), SMD
Study designsRandomized controlled trialsRCTs (n=31; 25 in meta-analysis)
TimingAt least 1 month follow-upFollow-up from immediate to 6 months or longer

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesYesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: YesNRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: NoNRSI: N/A · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes