Non-Cochrane · DTA · PM42541433

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Low Bone Density Assessment. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alrashidi Mohammad, Elbishari Haitham, Aljanahi May, et al. · Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1002/cre2.70423

Findings

Population Adults (18 years or older) undergoing both CBCT and DEXA for bone mineral density assessment

7 findings

CBCT (index test)DEXA (reference standard)Negative likelihood ratio for low bone mineral density
Single time point (cross-sectional) · Dental imaging; mandible, cervical vertebrae and jaw sites · Overall
LR- 0.53
GRADE not reported
13 studies
CBCT (index test)DEXA (reference standard)Sensitivity and specificity by sample size
Single time point (cross-sectional) · Dental imaging; mandible, cervical vertebrae and jaw sites · Sample size 60 or more vs fewer than 60
Subgrouping by sample size (60 or more participants) was significantly associated with pooled sensitivity and specificity (p<0.05); estimates not given numerically
GRADE not reported
13 studies
CBCT (index test)DEXA (reference standard)Positive likelihood ratio for low bone mineral density
Single time point (cross-sectional) · Dental imaging; mandible, cervical vertebrae and jaw sites · Overall
LR+ 3
GRADE not reported
13 studies
CBCT (index test)DEXA (reference standard)Area under the SROC curve for detecting low bone mineral density
Single time point (cross-sectional) · Dental imaging; mandible, cervical vertebrae and jaw sites · Overall
AUC 0.73 [0.69, 0.77]
GRADE not reported
13 studies
CBCT (index test)DEXA (reference standard)Pooled sensitivity for detecting low bone mineral density
Single time point (cross-sectional) · Dental imaging; mandible, cervical vertebrae and jaw sites · Overall
Sensitivity 0.58 [0.50, 0.67]
GRADE not reported
13 studies
CBCT (index test)DEXA (reference standard)Pooled specificity for detecting low bone mineral density
Single time point (cross-sectional) · Dental imaging; mandible, cervical vertebrae and jaw sites · Overall
Specificity 0.78 [0.69, 0.86]
GRADE not reported
13 studies
CBCT (index test)DEXA (reference standard)Sensitivity and specificity by anatomical site
Single time point (cross-sectional) · Dental imaging; mandible, cervical vertebrae and jaw sites · Cervical vertebrae vs other sites
Anatomical site (cervical vertebrae vs other sites) was significantly associated with pooled sensitivity and specificity (p<0.05); estimates not given numerically
GRADE not reported
13 studies

Included primary studies 23

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Barngkgei 2014
Osteoporosis prediction from the mandible using cone-beam computed tomography.
PMID:25473633
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barngkgei 2015
An innovative approach in osteoporosis opportunistic screening by the dental practitioner: the use of cervical vertebrae and cone beam…
DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2015.08.008
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barngkgei 2015
An innovative approach in osteoporosis opportunistic screening by the dental practitioner: the use of cervical vertebrae and cone beam…
PMID:26453386
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barngkgei 2016
Assessment of jawbone trabecular bone structure amongst osteoporotic women by cone‐beam computed tomography: the OSTEOSYR project
DOI:10.1111/jicd.12170
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barngkgei 2016
Assessment of jawbone trabecular bone structure amongst osteoporotic women by cone-beam computed tomography: the OSTEOSYR project.
PMID:26097193
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barra 2021
New mandibular indices in cone beam computed tomography to identify low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women
DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2020.07.016
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barra 2021
New mandibular indices in cone beam computed tomography to identify low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
PMID:32843313
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barra 2022
Indices in dental image exams for bone mineral density evaluation of aromatase inhibitor users
DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0138
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barra 2022
Indices in dental image exams for bone mineral density evaluation of aromatase inhibitor users.
PMID:36477215
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Carvalho 2022
Fractal dimension analysis on CBCT scans for detecting low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
PMID:35387102
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Castro 2020
A new cone-beam computed tomography–driven index for osteoporosis prediction
DOI:10.1007/s00784-019-03193-4
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Castro 2020
A new cone-beam computed tomography-driven index for osteoporosis prediction.
PMID:31912243
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Esmaeli 2017
Efficacy of radiographic density values of the first and second cervical vertebrae recorded by CBCT technique to identify patients with…
DOI:10.15171/joddd.2017.034
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Esmaeli 2017
Efficacy of radiographic density values of the first and second cervical vertebrae recorded by CBCT technique to identify patients with…
PMID:29184636
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gungor 2016
Evaluation of osteoporosis in jaw bones using cone beam CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
DOI:10.2334/josnusd.15-0609
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gungor 2016
Evaluation of osteoporosis in jaw bones using cone beam CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
PMID:27349539
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kato 2019
Digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT as ancillary tools to detect low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women
DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20180254
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kato 2019
Digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT as ancillary tools to detect low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women.
PMID:30306800
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shokri 2019
Relationship of gray values in cone beam computed tomography and bone mineral density obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2019.04.017
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shokri 2019
Relationship of gray values in cone beam computed tomography and bone mineral density obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
PMID:31171482
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Slaidina 2022
Gray values of the cervical vertebrae detected by cone beam computed tomography for the identification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in…
DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2021.06.014
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Slaidina 2022
Gray values of the cervical vertebrae detected by cone beam computed tomography for the identification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in…
PMID:34535433
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Slaidina 2023
The Effect of General Bone Mineral Density on the Quantity and Quality of the Edentulous Mandible: A Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.
PMID:36661554
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (>=18 years), male and female, undergoing CBCT and DEXA for low BMD assessmentAdults, mostly postmenopausal women (n=13 studies)
InterventionCBCT (index test)CBCT gray value, radiomorphometric indices, fractal dimension at mandible, jaws and cervical vertebrae (n=13)
ComparisonDEXA (reference standard)DEXA T-score at lumbar spine or femoral neck (n=13)
OutcomesSensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, AUCPooled sensitivity 0.58, specificity 0.78, AUC 0.73, LR+ 3, LR- 0.53 (n=13)
Study designsProspective or retrospective observational cross-sectional, cohort or case-control studies; English onlyCross-sectional observational studies (n=13)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified