Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42226287

Ten-year outcomes of short dental implants (≤ 6 mm): a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis.

Lin Linni, Ren Yijie, Zhu Enhui, et al. · BMC oral health · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-08742-4

Findings

Population Completely or partially edentulous adults receiving dental implants

46 findings

Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data
Proportion 0.937 [0.878, 0.980]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 255 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year peri-implant mucositis, implant level
10 years
Proportion 0.336 [0.173, 0.521]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 114 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year marginal bone loss (mm), implant level
10 years
Mean (mm) 0.277 [0.117, 0.436]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 202 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year marginal bone loss (mm), patient level
10 years · Sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk study (Storelli 2018)
Mean (mm) 0.154 [-0.013, 0.322]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year marginal bone loss (mm), implant level
10 years · Sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk study (Rossi 2018)
Mean (mm) 0.185 [-0.61, 0.209]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Imputed data: prosthesis connection: cemented-retained
Proportion 0.9683 [0.9089, 0.9995]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Imputed data (loss to follow-up interpolation, relative incidence 2)
Proportion 0.928 [0.861, 0.976]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 318 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Imputed data: implant superstructure: splinted crowns
Proportion 0.9789 [0.8514, 1.0000]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Complete case data
Proportion 0.912 [0.843, 0.965]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 173 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Imputed data: prosthesis connection: screw-retained
Proportion 0.7363 [0.4880, 0.9269]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Complete case data: implant superstructure: single crowns
Proportion 0.9001 [0.8199, 0.9611]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Imputed data: study design: prospective cohort studies
Proportion 0.9535 [0.8299, 1.0000]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Imputed data: study design: RCTs
Proportion 0.8991 [0.8415, 0.9461]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Imputed data: prosthesis connection: screw-retained
Proportion 0.8070 [0.7188, 0.8826]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Imputed data: implant superstructure: splinted crowns
Proportion 0.9372 [0.6685, 1.0000]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Imputed data: implant superstructure: single crowns
Proportion 0.8859 [0.7757, 0.9653]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data: implant location: maxilla
Proportion 0.9345 [0.8719, 0.9804]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year technical complications, patient level
10 years
Proportion 0.235 [0.047, 0.494]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 167 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Complete case data: study design: RCTs
Proportion 0.8955 [0.8198, 0.9551]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Complete case data: implant superstructure: splinted crowns
Proportion 0.9593 [0.7697, 1.0000]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Complete case data: study design: prospective cohort studies
Proportion 0.9321 [0.7684, 1.0000]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year marginal bone loss (mm), patient level
10 years
Mean (mm) 0.277 [-0.021, 0.575]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 64 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data: study design: prospective cohort studies
Proportion 0.9566 [0.8510, 1.0000]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year peri-implantitis, implant level
10 years
Proportion 0.004 [0.000, 0.024]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 211 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data: implant superstructure: splinted crowns
Proportion 0.9888 [0.9047, 1.0000]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Imputed data: implant superstructure: single crowns
Proportion 0.9069 [0.8286, 0.9650]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Imputed data: study design: prospective cohort studies
Proportion 0.9207 [0.7099, 1.0000]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data: prosthesis connection: cemented-retained
Proportion 0.9697 [0.9121, 0.9997]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Imputed data (loss to follow-up interpolation, relative incidence 2)
Proportion 0.897 [0.805, 0.965]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 214 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Imputed data: prosthesis connection: cemented-retained
Proportion 0.9486 [0.8738, 0.9950]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data: implant location: mandible
Proportion 0.9359 [0.8376, 0.9948]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data: prosthesis connection: screw-retained
Proportion 0.8357 [0.7436, 0.9117]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Complete case data: prosthesis connection: cemented-retained
Proportion 0.7955 [0.6191, 0.9308]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data: study design: RCTs
Proportion 0.9145 [0.8507, 0.9638]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data: implant superstructure: single crowns
Proportion 0.9167 [0.8490, 0.9676]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Imputed data: study design: RCTs
Proportion 0.8832 [0.8162, 0.9383]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)None10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Complete case data: prosthesis connection: screw-retained
Proportion 0.9509 [0.8834, 0.9941]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Complete case data
RR 0.943 [0.896, 0.992]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 233 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year marginal bone loss (mm), implant level
10 years
No significant difference between short and long implants (marginal bone loss (implant level)); estimate not reported in text
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year peri-implantitis, implant level
10 years
No significant difference between short and long implants (peri-implantitis); estimate not reported in text
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year technical complications, patient level
10 years
No significant difference between short and long implants (technical complications); estimate not reported in text
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Complete case data
RR 0.920 [0.857, 0.987]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 183 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year implant survival rate, patient level
10 years · Imputed data (loss to follow-up interpolation, relative incidence 2)
RR 0.912 [0.854, 0.974]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 259 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year marginal bone loss (mm), patient level
10 years
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
No significant difference between short and long implants (marginal bone loss (patient level)); estimate not reported in text
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year implant survival rate, implant level
10 years · Imputed data (loss to follow-up interpolation, relative incidence 2)
RR 0.924 [0.877, 0.973]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 328 participants
Short dental implants (6 mm or less)Long dental implants (10 mm or more)10-year peri-implant mucositis, implant level
10 years
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
No significant difference between short and long implants (peri-implant mucositis); estimate not reported in text
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 8

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Thoma 2024
Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with…
PMID:38296249
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Bregagnol 2024
Long-term clinical performance of short 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region: A 10-year cohort study.
PMID:37882144
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guljé 2024 a (mandible, prospective cohort)
Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: A 10-year prospective case series.
PMID:38534097
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guljé 2024 b (posterior maxilla RCT)
Single crowns in the posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm long implants with sinus floor augmentation or by 6-mm long implants: A…
PMID:37941089
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Petroni 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rossi 2018
Long-term follow-up of single crowns supported by short, moderately rough implants-A prospective 10-year cohort study.
PMID:30430655
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sahrmann 2023
Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
PMID:37387401
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Storelli 2018
6 mm vs 10 mm-long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior jaws: A 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
PMID:30246182
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationCompletely or partially edentulous adults receiving dental implantsEdentulous adults with posterior short implants (214 patients, 318 short implants; 4 RCTs n=128 patients short, 131 long)
InterventionAt least one short dental implant (6 mm or shorter)Short implants 5 to 6 mm (n=318 implants)
ComparisonAt least one long dental implant (10 mm or longer), if availableLong implants 10 mm or longer in 4 RCTs (n=167 implants)
Outcomes10-year implant survival (primary); technical and biological complications and marginal bone loss (secondary)10-year survival (patient and implant level), technical complications, peri-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis, marginal bone loss
Study designsRCTs or prospective cohort studies with 10-year follow-up4 RCTs and 4 prospective cohort studies (n=8)
Timing10 years10 years

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailYesPartial Yesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: YesNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: Yesyes
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoYesno
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes