Non-Cochrane · aetiology · PM42220287

Reciprocal association between neurovascular conflict and trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Golubevas Raimundas, Buškus Augustinas, Janužis Gintaras, et al. · Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.22514/jofph.2026.035

Findings

14 findings

Population
Trigeminal nerves of individuals without trigeminal neuralgia (non-TN)Neurovascular contact (NVC) of the trigeminal nerve on MRINone (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of NVC (proportion of nerves)
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
Proportion (common-effect) 0.67 [0.62, 0.72]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 332 participants
Trigeminal nerves of individuals without trigeminal neuralgia (non-TN)Neurovascular contact (NVC) of the trigeminal nerve on MRINone (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of NVC (proportion of nerves)
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
Proportion (random-effects) 0.667 [0.589, 0.738]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 332 participants
Symptomatic trigeminal nerves of patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)Neurovascular contact (NVC) of the trigeminal nerve on MRINone (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of NVC (proportion of nerves)
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
Proportion (common-effect) 0.88 [0.84, 0.91]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 357 participants
Symptomatic trigeminal nerves of patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)Neurovascular contact (NVC) of the trigeminal nerve on MRINone (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of NVC (proportion of nerves)
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
Proportion (random-effects) 0.875 [0.813, 0.918]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 357 participants
All trigeminal nerves examined (TN and non-TN groups combined)Neurovascular contact (NVC) of the trigeminal nerve on MRINone (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of NVC (proportion of nerves)
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
Proportion (common-effect) 0.76 [0.72, 0.79]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 689 participants
All trigeminal nerves examined (TN and non-TN groups combined)Neurovascular contact (NVC) of the trigeminal nerve on MRINone (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of NVC (proportion of nerves)
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
Proportion (random-effects) 0.79 [0.69, 0.87]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 689 participants
Patients with trigeminal neuralgia (both nerves of the same individuals)NVC on the symptomatic nerveNVC on the asymptomatic nervePresence of NVC
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
OR 3.49 [1.97, 6.20]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 609 participants
Patients with trigeminal neuralgia (both nerves of the same individuals)NVC on the symptomatic nerveNVC on the asymptomatic nervePresence of NVC
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
OR (common-effect) 3.34 [2.11, 5.27]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 609 participants
Asymptomatic trigeminal nerves (non-TN individuals and asymptomatic side of TN patients)Neurovascular contact (NVC) of the trigeminal nerve on MRINone (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of NVC (proportion of nerves)
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
Proportion (random-effects) 0.740 [0.700, 0.770]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 500 participants
Individuals without trigeminal neuralgia with NVC detectedSevere NVCNon-severe (simple) NVCSevere versus non-severe NVC
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
OR (random-effects) 0.02 [0.01, 0.10]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 446 participants
Patients with trigeminal neuralgiaArterial versus venous NVC on the symptomatic sideArterial versus venous NVC on the asymptomatic sideArterial NVC
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
OR (random-effects) 2.22 [0.04, 136.57]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 262 participants
Patients with trigeminal neuralgiaArterial versus venous NVC on the symptomatic sideArterial versus venous NVC on the asymptomatic sideArterial NVC
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
OR (common-effect) 2.18 [1.21, 3.94]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 262 participants
Patients with trigeminal neuralgiaNVC located at the root entry zone (REZ) versus elsewhere on the symptomatic nerveNVC located at the REZ versus elsewhere on the asymptomatic nerveNVC at the root entry zone
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
OR (random-effects) 0.74 [0.41, 1.32]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 404 participants
Patients with trigeminal neuralgiaNVC located at the root entry zone (REZ) versus elsewhere on the symptomatic nerveNVC located at the REZ versus elsewhere on the asymptomatic nerveNVC at the root entry zone
MRI (1.5 T or 3 T) of the trigeminal nerve
OR (common-effect) 0.73 [0.41, 1.30]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 404 participants

Included primary studies 12

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Docampo 2015
Neurovascular study of the trigeminal nerve at 3 t MRI.
PMID:25924169
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Docampo J 2015
Neurovascular Study of the Trigeminal Nerve at 3T MRI
DOI:10.15274/nrj-2014-10116
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jani 2019
Trigeminal Nerve Compression Without Trigeminal Neuralgia: Intraoperative vs Imaging Evidence.
PMID:29425330
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jani RH 2019
Trigeminal Nerve Compression Without Trigeminal Neuralgia: Intraoperative vs Imaging Evidence
DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyx636
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kumar A 2025
Frequency of trigeminal neurovascular contacts identified on 3D-fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition magnetic resonance imaging…
PMID:39926468
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Li H 2024
A combined radiomics and anatomical features model enhances MRI-based recognition of symptomatic nerves in primary trigeminal neuralgia.
PMID:39513045
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maarbjerg 2015
Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia.
PMID:25541189
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maarbjerg S 2015
Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia
DOI:10.1093/brain/awu349
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maurya 2019
Trigeminal neuralgia: When does neurovascular contact turn into a conflict?
PMID:31065180
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maurya V 2019
Trigeminal neuralgia: When does neurovascular contact turn into a conflict?
DOI:10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.11.007
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ruiz-Juretschke 2019
Neurovascular Relations of the Trigeminal Nerve in Asymptomatic Individuals Studied with High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Magnetic…
PMID:29659161
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ruiz-Juretschke F 2019
Neurovascular Relations of the Trigeminal Nerve in Asymptomatic Individuals Studied with High‐Resolution Three‐Dimensional Magnetic…
DOI:10.1002/ar.23818
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with diagnosed trigeminal neuralgia and individuals without TN or facial pain, evaluated by MRI699 patients; 1092 trigeminal nerves (357 symptomatic, 735 asymptomatic) (n=7 studies)
InterventionPresence of neurovascular contact of the trigeminal nerve on MRINVC on MRI (3 T in 5 studies, 1.5 T in 2 studies)
ComparisonPatients with NVC on MRI without symptoms of TN or facial pain; asymptomatic nerves of TN patientsNon-TN individuals (n=342); asymptomatic nerves of TN patients (n=303)
OutcomesTrigeminal neuralgia expression; presence, severity, vessel type and location of NVCNVC prevalence by TN status; OR symptomatic vs asymptomatic nerves; severe vs non-severe NVC; arterial vs venous; REZ location
Study designsIn vivo MRI studies in English, 2015-2025 (case-control, cross-sectional)Case-control (2), cross-sectional/observational (5) studies
TimingNot specifiedNot specified