Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41851361

"Vertical safety zone" as a clinical framework: Is temporarization necessary when increasing VDO within the VDR? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hajeer Osama, Hasan Amal · The Saudi dental journal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s44445-026-00146-y

Findings

4 findings

Population
Adults undergoing full-mouth or multi-unit fixed prosthodontic rehabilitationIncrease in VDO maintained within or equal to VDR (immediate or short-term mock-up)None (single-arm pooled proportion)Restoration survival (replacement-free)
3 to 5.5 years follow-up · Fixed restorations placed at increased VDO within or equal to VDR · Overall
Pooled proportion (%) 97.8 [95.6, 98.9]
Moderate
4 studies · 2201 participants
Adults undergoing full-mouth or multi-unit fixed prosthodontic rehabilitationIncrease in VDO maintained within or equal to VDR (immediate or short-term mock-up)None (single-arm pooled proportion)Annual failure rate
Per year of follow-up (3 to 5.5 years) · Fixed restorations placed at increased VDO within or equal to VDR · Overall
Annual failure rate (%/year) 1.28 [0.7, 2.1]
Moderate
4 studies · 2201 participants
Adults undergoing full-mouth or multi-unit fixed prosthodontic rehabilitationIncrease in VDO maintained within or equal to VDR (immediate or short-term mock-up)None (single-arm pooled proportion)Clinical success (including minor repairs)
3 to 5.5 years follow-up · Fixed restorations placed at increased VDO within or equal to VDR · Overall
Pooled proportion (%) 94.0 [90.5, 96.5]
Moderate
4 studies · 2201 participants
Adults undergoing full-mouth or multi-unit fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation with VDO increased within or equal to VDRTemporarization phase before definitive restorationsImmediate definitive restorations without temporarizationRestoration survival, clinical success, adverse functional effects, patient-reported adaptation
Fixed restorations placed at increased VDO within or equal to VDR
None of the studies conducted a direct comparison between full temporarization (>= 2 weeks) and immediate restoration.
No studies found
0 studies

Included primary studies 10

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Mehta 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Abduo 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gulamali 2011
Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
PMID:21869770
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hemmings 2000
Tooth wear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: results at 30 months.
PMID:10709036
2000this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Loomans 2018
Quantitative discoloration assessment of peri-implant soft tissue around zirconia and other abutments with different colours: A systematic…
DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.003
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maier 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Malchiodi 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Proschel 2002
Secondary caries susceptibility of teeth with long-term performing composite restorations.
PMID:12472848
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ramseyer 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ramseyer 2015
Bond Strength of a Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Class II MOD Cavities.
PMID:26525007
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults undergoing full-mouth or multi-unit fixed prosthodontic rehabilitationPatients with fixed rehabilitations at increased VDO within VDR (2,201 restorations; n=9 studies)
InterventionIncrease in VDO maintained within or equal to VDRIncreased VDO of 1.5 to 5 mm within VDR; direct composite and indirect ceramic restorations
ComparisonRehabilitation with or without a temporarization phaseTemporarization absent or mock-up under 48 h; no direct comparison with full temporarization (n=0)
OutcomesRestoration survival; clinical success; adverse functional effects (muscle pain, TMD); patient-reported adaptationReplacement-free survival, clinical success, annual failure rate (n=4); TMD and muscular complications narrative
Study designsRandomized trials, prospective or retrospective cohorts, case series with at least 10 patients1 RCT, 3 prospective cohorts, 4 observational studies, 1 case series
TimingNot specified2.5 to 5.5 years follow-up

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Partial Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Partial Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: No · RCT: Partial Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesNono
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowCritically Lowno