Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41744926

Effects of Oral Probiotics on Streptococcus mutans in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Caiza-Rennella Andrea, Ordoñez-Balladares Andrea, Caicedo-Quiroz Rosangela, et al. · Dentistry journal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/dj14020087

Findings

Population Children aged 6 months to 12 years

2 findings

Oral Lactobacillus reuteri and/or L. rhamnosus probiotics for at least 30 daysPlacebo or identical product without viable microorganismsProportion of children with high salivary S. mutans counts (>=10^5 CFU/mL)
End of follow-up (56 days to 21 months)
OR 0.73 [0.51, 1.06]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
4 studies · 1236 participants
Oral Lactobacillus reuteri and/or L. rhamnosus probiotics for at least 30 daysPlacebo or identical product without viable microorganismsSalivary Streptococcus mutans load (log10 CFU/mL)
End of follow-up (30 days to 3 months)
MD -0.65 [-0.97, -0.34]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
2 studies · 126 participants

Included primary studies 7

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Almabadi 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewProportion of children with high salivary S. mutans counts (>=10^5 CFU/mL)not extracted yet
Badri 2021
Effectiveness of probiotic lozenges and Chlorhexidine mouthwash on plaque index, salivary pH, and Streptococcus mutans count among school…
PMID:34803312
2021this review onlySalivary Streptococcus mutans load (log10 CFU/mL)not extracted yet
Janwong 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlySalivary Streptococcus mutans load (log10 CFU/mL)not extracted yet
Janwong 2025
How to evaluate health promotion.
PMID:112025
1979this review onlySalivary Streptococcus mutans load (log10 CFU/mL)not extracted yet
Nase 2001
Effect of long-term consumption of a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, in milk on dental caries and caries risk in children.
PMID:11799281
2001this review onlyProportion of children with high salivary S. mutans counts (>=10^5 CFU/mL)not extracted yet
Pohjavuori 2010
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyProportion of children with high salivary S. mutans counts (>=10^5 CFU/mL)not extracted yet
Stecksen-Blicks 2009
Effect of long-term consumption of milk supplemented with probiotic lactobacilli and fluoride on dental caries and general health in…
PMID:19690413
2009this review onlyProportion of children with high salivary S. mutans counts (>=10^5 CFU/mL)not extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren aged 6 months to 12 years, healthy or at risk for cariesChildren aged 1 to 12 years (N=1362)
InterventionOral L. reuteri and/or L. rhamnosus (any formulation) for at least 30 daysL. rhamnosus SD11, GG or LB21 and L. reuteri DSM17938/ATCC PTA5289 in milk, juice, milk powder or lozenges (n=699)
ComparisonPlacebo or identical product without viable microorganismsIdentical product without viable microorganisms (n=663)
OutcomesS. mutans levels in saliva or plaque (CFU/mL, log10 CFU/mL, or proportion with high counts >=10^5 CFU/mL)Salivary S. mutans log10 CFU/mL (2 RCTs, n=126); proportion with high S. mutans counts (4 RCTs, n=1236); plaque S. mutans in one study only
Study designsRandomized controlled trials (parallel or cluster)6 RCTs (including one cluster RCT)
TimingIntervention duration at least 30 daysIntervention duration 30 days to 21 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes