Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41699350

Keyhole retrosigmoid approach for microvascular decompression surgery: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Weiger Valentin F, Halbeisen Florian S, Constanzo Felipe, et al. · Neurosurgical review · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s10143-026-04178-0

Findings

47 findings

Population
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Hemorrhagic or ischemic complication (all transient)
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.009
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Any surgical complication
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.139 [0.107, 0.180]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 5767 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Partial symptom resolution
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.056 [0.045, 0.069]
GRADE not reported
27 studies · 4849 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Complete symptom resolution
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.904 [0.877, 0.925]
GRADE not reported
31 studies · 5406 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent neurological deficit (all cranial nerves)
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.047 [0.030, 0.074]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Infection, wound problem or CSF leak
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.036
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient cranial nerve deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.054
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Other complications (ataxia, dislodged Teflon pieces, tension pneumocephalus)
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.011
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Treatment failure
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.041 [0.028, 0.061]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 4448 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (all NVCS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Symptom recurrence
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.039 [0.028, 0.054]
GRADE not reported
30 studies · 5069 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient CN V deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.021
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent CN VII deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.006
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Any surgical complication
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.115 [0.086, 0.153]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 2112 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent CN VIII deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.019 [0.011, 0.035]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Treatment failure
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.037
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgiaKeyhole retrosigmoid microvascular decompression (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm)Complete symptom resolution
Last reported follow-up · Trigeminal neuralgia
Proportion 0.898 [0.855, 0.93]
GRADE not reported
14 studies · 1807 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Infection, wound problem or CSF leak
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.036
GRADE not reported
2219 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Partial symptom resolution
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.058
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient cranial nerve deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.035
GRADE not reported
2219 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent cranial nerve deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.034
GRADE not reported
2219 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient CN VIII deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.015
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Symptom recurrence
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.043
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient CN VII deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.011
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient other CN (IX to XII) deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.007
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent sensory CN V deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.026 [0.013, 0.050]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with trigeminal neuralgia (TN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Hemorrhagic or ischemic complication
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.009
GRADE not reported
2219 participants
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Partial symptom resolution
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.056
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Any surgical complication
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.167 [0.106, 0.253]
GRADE not reported
17 studies · 3616 participants
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Treatment failure
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.043
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent cranial nerve deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.059
GRADE not reported
3625 participants
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient other CN (IX to XII) deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.009
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent CN VII deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.021 [0.008, 0.050]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Complete symptom resolution
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.911 [0.871, 0.940]
GRADE not reported
17 studies · 3560 participants
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Infection, wound problem or CSF leak
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.032
GRADE not reported
3625 participants
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Symptom recurrence
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.031
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient CN VIII deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.020
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent CN V deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.009
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent CN VIII deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.050 [0.026, 0.094]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Permanent other CN (IX to XII) deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.010
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient CN VII deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.042
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Transient cranial nerve deficit
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.069
GRADE not reported
3625 participants
Adults with hemifacial spasm (HFS)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Hemorrhagic or ischemic complication
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.008
GRADE not reported
3625 participants
Adults with glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Any surgical complication
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.188 [0.094, 0.338]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 39 participants
Adults with glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Symptom recurrence
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.046
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Partial symptom resolution
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.113
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Treatment failure
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.046
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN)First-time microvascular decompression (with or without internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy) via a retrosigmoid keyhole approach (bone window <=2 cm)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Complete symptom resolution
Last reported follow-up
Proportion 0.887 [0.746, 0.954]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 39 participants

Included primary studies 32

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Artz 2008
Endoscopic vascular decompression.
PMID:18698270
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Blue 2020
Endoscopic Microvascular Decompression for Vagoglossopharyngeal Neuralgia.
PMID:33520548
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chen 2008
Endoscopic neurovascular perspective in microvascular decompression of trigeminal neuralgia.
PMID:18619848
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cheng 2008
Endoscopic microvascular decompression of the hemifacial spasm.
PMID:19061769
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Eby 2001
Fully endoscopic vascular decompression of the facial nerve for hemifacial spasm.
PMID:17167620
2001this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
El-Garem 2002
Endoscopy as a tool in minimally invasive trigeminal neuralgia surgery.
PMID:11875338
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ferroli 2010
Advanced age as a contraindication to microvascular decompression for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia: evidence of prejudice?
PMID:19806315
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fu 2024
Application of the semidiving technique in fully endoscopic microvascular decompression.
PMID:39174761
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guo 2022
Fully Endoscopic Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm Using Improved Retrosigmoid Infrafloccular Approach: Clinical Analysis…
PMID:35726928
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guo 2024
Standard operating procedure and surgical technique innovation in fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia:…
PMID:39186137
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Huang 2021
The Efficacy and Safety of <2 cm Micro-Keyhole Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm.
PMID:34395510
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Iwami 2021
Feasibility of underwater microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a technical note.
PMID:34218323
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jarrahy 2000
Endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve.
PMID:10964294
2000this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Li 2018
Retrospective clinical analysis of 320 cases of microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.
PMID:30313020
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Liu 2016
Microvascular decompression for atypical hemifacial spasm: lessons learned from a retrospective study of 12 cases.
PMID:26339846
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ma 2010
Keyhole microsurgery for trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm and glossopharyngeal neuralgia.
PMID:19536556
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Magnan 1997
Hemifacial spasm: endoscopic vascular decompression.
PMID:9339788
1997this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Montava 2016
Long-term surgical results in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: efficacy, morbidity and quality of life.
PMID:27214834
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pak 2022
Fully Endoscopic Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Technical Note Describing a Single-Center Experience.
PMID:35817347
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ricci 2019
Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid approach in hemifacial spasm: our experience.
PMID:29784621
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rossini 2024
Microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia using a robot-assisted exoscope and head-mounted display.
PMID:39616645
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sun 2020
Endoscopic Vascular Decompression for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Clinical Outcomes and Technical Note.
PMID:32943913
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Teo 2006
Endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: technical case report.
PMID:17041524
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2018
Does Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia Need Rhizotomy in Neurovascular Decompression Surgery?
PMID:30320682
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2021
Improving recovery after microvascular decompression surgery for hemifacial spasm: experience from 530 cases with enhanced recovery after…
PMID:33650924
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yan 2021
Facial root entry/exit zone contact in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a historical control study.
PMID:34164468
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yang 2014
The efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia in patients older than 65 years.
PMID:24816027
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yang 2019
The efficacy and safety of nerve combing for trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression.
PMID:30838601
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yu 2024
Comparison of the Efficacy of Complete Endoscopic and Microscopic Vascular Decompression in the Treatment of Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia.
PMID:39032638
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yuan 2005
Microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm: report of 1200 cases.
PMID:15989764
2005this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yun 2024
Preliminary Report of Fully Endoscopic Microvascular Decompression.
PMID:38583999
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhu 2021
Fully endoscopic versus microscopic vascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a retrospective cohort study.
PMID:33765219
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (>18 years) with trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm or glossopharyngeal neuralgia undergoing first-time surgery5883 patients: TN 2219, HFS 3625, GPN 39
InterventionMVD, internal neurolysis or partial rhizotomy via keyhole retrosigmoid approach (bone window <=2 cm)MVD 5825; internal neurolysis 43; MVD plus partial rhizotomy 15; microscopic 72.5%, endoscopic-assisted 14.6%, fully endoscopic 12.8%
ComparisonNone (single-arm); comparative cohort studies allowedNone; no study compared keyhole with standard craniotomy
OutcomesSymptom relief (complete, partial, failure, recurrence) and complications (primary); reoperationComplete resolution 90.4%; partial 5.6%; failure 4.1%; recurrence 3.9%; any complication 13.9%; permanent neurological deficit 4.7%
Study designsObservational studies, case series, comparative cohort studies, technical notes32 studies: 23 observational, 9 comparative cohorts; 30 retrospective, 2 prospective
TimingMinimum follow-up 1 month; outcomes at last reported follow-upMean follow-up 3.9 years (range 0.1-12.0)

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalNoNoyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoYesno
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateNoNoyes
6Data extraction in duplicateNoNoyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRSI: Partial YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/Ano
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalNRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/Ano
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalPartial YesYesno
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes