Non-Cochrane · umbrella · PM41267395

Fluoride Varnish for Caries Prevention in Preschoolers: An Overview of Reviews.

Couto Flávia Macedo, Sousa Fernanda Santos de Oliveira, Dhyppolito Izabel Monteiro, et al. · Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1111/cdoe.70032

Findings

Population Preschoolers (children up to 71 months of age)

30 findings

Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Proportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)RR 0.88 [0.81, 0.95]
-47 [-74, -19] per 1000 children
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
16 studies · 9373 participants
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Proportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)RR 0.81 [0.62, 1.06]
Moderate
5 studies
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Proportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)OR 0.63 [0.48, 0.81]
Low
5 studies
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Caries increment, dmfs (surface level)
Nearest to 3 years
Prevented Fraction 0.37 [0.24, 0.51]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
10 studies · 3804 participants
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Incidence of early childhood cariesPrevented Fraction 18
Low
3 studies
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Caries increment, dmft (tooth level)Prevented Fraction 31.13 [21.08, 41.18]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
12 studies
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Caries increment, dmfs (surface level)Prevented Fraction 24.15 [12.91, 35.38]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
12 studies
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Caries increment in the primary dentitionSMD -0.19 [-0.39, 0.02]
Very low
7 studies
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Caries increment, dmfs (surface level)MD -0.77 [-1.23, -0.31]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Caries increment, dmft (tooth level)MD -0.30 [-0.69, 0.09]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)Placebo, usual care or no intervention (all comparators combined)Caries increment, dmft (tooth level)Prevented Fraction 0.65 [0.48, 0.82]
Moderate
2 studies
Fluoride varnish (FV)PlaceboProportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)
FV vs placebo
RR 0.86 [0.72, 1.03]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)PlaceboCaries increment, dmft (tooth level)
FV vs placebo
Prevented Fraction 33.73 [22.78, 44.68]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)PlaceboCaries increment, dmfs (surface level)
FV vs placebo
Prevented Fraction 30.49 [8.01, 52.96]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)Usual careProportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)
FV vs usual care
RR 0.84 [0.72, 0.98]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)Usual careCaries increment, dmfs (surface level)
FV vs usual care
Prevented Fraction -33.33 [-105.56, 14.52]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)No interventionProportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)
FV vs no intervention
RR 0.85 [0.73, 0.98]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)No interventionCaries increment, dmfs (surface level)
FV vs no intervention
Prevented Fraction 23.70 [7.86, 39.55]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Fluoride varnish (FV)No interventionCaries increment, dmft (tooth level)
FV vs no intervention
Prevented Fraction 17.07 [-12.49, 38.42]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
FV plus oral health advice, community health promotion and 500 ppm F toothpasteNo interventionCaries increment, dmfs (surface level)
FV with oral health program vs no intervention
Prevented Fraction 23.96 [8.42, 37.47]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
FV plus oral health advice, community health promotion and 500 ppm F toothpasteNo interventionProportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)
FV with oral health program vs no intervention
RR 1.00 [0.94, 1.06]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
FV plus oral health advice and 1450 ppm F toothpasteOral health adviceProportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)
FV with oral health advice and toothpaste vs oral health advice
RR 0.87 [0.75, 1.02]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
FV plus oral health adviceOral health adviceCaries increment, dmft (tooth level)
FV with oral health advice vs oral health advice
Prevented Fraction 28.57 [-365.42, 106.77]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
FV as adjunct to regular fluoride toothpaste (>=1000 ppm)Regular fluoride toothpaste aloneProportion of children with new caries (caries incidence)RR 0.91 [0.80, 1.05]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
Studies not reported
FV as adjunct to regular fluoride toothpaste (>=1000 ppm)Regular fluoride toothpaste aloneCaries increment in the primary dentitionPooled estimate (continuous) -0.17 [-0.60, 0.26]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
6 studies
FV as adjunct to regular fluoride toothpaste (>=1000 ppm)Regular fluoride toothpaste aloneChanges in prevalence of caries (prevalence at follow-up minus prevalence at baseline)RR 0.89 [0.78, 1.01]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Studies not reported
5% NaF varnish applied every 6 monthsControl (placebo or no intervention)Caries increment in the primary dentitionMean effect size -1.56 [-2.7, -0.41]
Low
11 studies
5% NaF varnish applied once per yearControl (placebo or no intervention)Caries increment in the primary dentitionMean effect size -1.53 [-3.99, 0.93]
Moderate
1 study
0.9% difluorosilane varnish applied every 3 monthsControl (placebo or no intervention)Caries increment in the primary dentitionMean effect size -5.10 [-8.45, -1.75]
Low
1 study
0.9% difluorosilane varnish applied every 6 monthsControl (placebo or no intervention)Caries increment in the primary dentitionMean effect size -0.10 [-2.99, 2.79]
Moderate
1 study

Included primary studies 14

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
He 2023
Clinical interventions with various agents to prevent early childhood caries: A systematic review with network meta-analysis.
PMID:36718540
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Azarpazhooh 2008
Fluoride varnish in the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review.
PMID:18298889
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bader 2001
A systematic review of selected caries prevention and management methods.
PMID:11784283
2001this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Carvalho 2010
Fluoride varnishes and decrease in caries incidence in preschool children: a systematic review.
PMID:20683562
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Manchanda 2021
Topical fluoride to prevent early childhood caries: Systematic review with network meta-analysis.
PMID:34780874
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Marinho 2013
Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents.
PMID:23846772
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mishra 2017
Role of fluoride varnish in preventing early childhood caries: A systematic review.
PMID:28702057
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Munteanu 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Petersson 2004
Professional fluoride varnish treatment for caries control: a systematic review of clinical trials.
PMID:15370638
2004this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rozier 2001
Effectiveness of methods used by dental professionals for the primary prevention of dental caries.
PMID:11699978
2001this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rup 2023
Caries incidence after professional fluoride treatment: a systematic review
DOI:10.22456/2177-0018.127960
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sousa 2019
Fluoride Varnish and Dental Caries in Preschoolers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PMID:31220835
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Twetman 2015
Evidence of Effectiveness of Current Therapies to Prevent and Treat Early Childhood Caries.
PMID:26063553
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yu 2021
The additional benefit of professional fluoride application for children as an adjunct to regular fluoride toothpaste: a systematic review…
PMID:33782769
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPreschoolers (children up to 71 months of age)Preschoolers; 14 systematic reviews (2001 to 2023) including 55 primary studies
InterventionFluoride varnish for caries prevention, regardless of fluoride concentration, agent, application frequency or brandFluoride varnish (mostly 5% sodium fluoride; 0.9% difluorosilane in some)
ComparisonPlacebo, standard care or no interventionPlacebo, usual care, no intervention, oral health advice or regular fluoride toothpaste alone
OutcomesPrimary: caries lesions at dentin level in the primary dentition (any index). Secondary: adverse effects, costsCaries incidence and increment (dmfs, dmft, prevented fraction); adverse effects and costs described narratively
Study designsSystematic reviews with or without meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials14 systematic reviews (5 with meta-analysis including 2 network meta-analyses)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified