Non-Cochrane · aetiology · PM31571246
Vegetarian diet and its possible influence on dental health: A systematic literature review.
Smits Kirsten P J, Listl Stefan, Jevdjevic Milica · Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2020 · PubMed · doi:10.1111/cdoe.12498
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full text, figures and supplements by two independent LLM extractors, disagreements adjudicated. Rows cite where in the review the value comes from.
Questions
9
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
0
Included studies
19
linked below
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 9 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Review question
| Element | Planned (methods) | Found (results) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | People assessed for dental hard-tissue health, comparing those following a vegetarian diet with those following a nonvegetarian diet (observational or intervention studies) | 18 studies (21 papers); 16 cross-sectional and 2 baseline reports of RCTs (treated as cross-sectional); mostly India (n=9), Finland (n=3), other European countries (n=4), Brazil (n=1), Trinidad and Tobago (n=1); source studies published 1979-2018 |
| Intervention | Vegetarian diet (any diet excluding all meat, poultry and fish) | Vegetarian diet |
| Comparison | Nonvegetarian diet | Nonvegetarian diet |
| Outcomes | (a) Noncarious/cervical lesions (NCCL: dental erosion, dental abrasion, cervical buccal defects); (b) dental caries (DMFT/DMFS, decayed/filled teeth or surfaces, (non)visible lesions, white spots); (c) number of natural teeth (missing/present teeth, edentulousness, MT component of DMFT) | Meta-analysed: presence of dental erosion (6 studies; OR 2.40) and DMFT score (4 studies; MD -0.15). Narrative: other NCCL/tooth wear, other dental caries measures (DMFS, decayed surfaces/teeth, root caries, white spots) and number of natural teeth |
| Study designs | Original observational or intervention studies comparing dental health in vegetarians vs nonvegetarians | Cross-sectional studies (n=16) and baseline reports of RCTs (n=2), the latter treated as cross-sectional |
| Timing | Not specified (no date or period restriction) | Not specified (cross-sectional); source studies published 1979-2018 |
Search date: 2019-04-17. Databases: PubMed; EMBASE; Web of Science; CINAHL
Questions and results
Vegetarian diet (any diet excluding all meat, poultry and fish) vs Nonvegetarian diet
Population: General population (children and adults) assessed for dental hard-tissue health
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Noncarious/cervical lesions and tooth wear (measures other than pooled dental erosion) Beyond dental erosion, vegetarians tended to have a higher prevalence of other NCCL and tooth wear than nonvegetarians, reported narratively (ungraded). Source: Results (NCCL); Appendix S5 (not in extracted text) · same question in other reviews | Eleven studies reported on NCCL using six definitions (presence of NCCL, presence of dental erosion, presence and severity of tooth wear, dental abrasion, cervical buccal defects); the six reporting presence of dental… | NR | Ungraded |
Dental caries (mean DMFT score) Adults only Among adults, the lower DMFT score in vegetarians was smaller and not statistically significant (mean difference -0.09, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.13; ungraded). Source: Results (Dental caries); Figure 3B · same question in other reviews | MD -0.09 [-0.32, 0.13] | 3 studies | Ungraded |
Presence of dental erosion Adults only Among adults, vegetarian diet was associated with almost threefold higher odds of dental erosion (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.64 to 5.26; ungraded). Source: Results (NCCL); Figure 2C · same question in other reviews | OR 2.94 [1.64, 5.26] | 5 studies | Ungraded |
Presence of dental erosion Adults only, excluding Linkosalo & Markkanen 1985 Among adults and excluding the outlier study, vegetarian diet was associated with higher odds of dental erosion with no heterogeneity (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.71; ungraded). Source: Results (NCCL); Figure 2D · same question in other reviews | OR 2.56 [1.77, 3.71] | 4 studies | Ungraded |
Number of natural teeth (missing/present teeth, edentulousness, MT component of DMFT) Evidence on the number of natural teeth was conflicting and could not be pooled (ungraded). Source: Results (Number of teeth); Appendix S5 (not in extracted text) · same question in other reviews | Seven studies reported on the number of teeth with conflicting findings; meta-analysis was not possible due to inconsistent outcome definitions. One study found vegetarians had significantly more teeth; two found no… | 7 studies | Ungraded |
Presence of dental erosion A vegetarian diet was associated with about twofold higher odds of dental erosion than a nonvegetarian diet (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.66; ungraded, mostly low-quality studies). Source: Abstract; Results (NCCL); Figure 2A · same question in other reviews | OR 2.40 [1.24, 4.66] | 6 studies | Ungraded |
Presence of dental erosion Sensitivity analysis excluding Linkosalo & Markkanen 1985 (outlier) After excluding an outlier study, the association between vegetarian diet and dental erosion remained significant (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.27; ungraded). Source: Results (NCCL); Figure 2B · same question in other reviews | OR 1.97 [1.19, 3.27] | 5 studies | Ungraded |
Dental caries measures other than pooled DMFT (DMFS, decayed/filled surfaces and teeth, root caries, nonvisible lesions, white spots) Evidence on other dental-caries measures was inconsistent: some indices (decayed surfaces/teeth, root caries, white spots) were higher in vegetarians while some studies found lower caries in vegetarian children (ungraded). Source: Results (Dental caries); Appendix S5 (not in extracted text) · same question in other reviews | Eleven studies reported dental caries using 11 definitions; four (DMFT) were meta-analysed (see O2). Narrative findings were inconsistent: DMFS results were mixed; decayed surfaces and decayed teeth and percentages of… | NR | Ungraded |
Dental caries (mean DMFT score) Vegetarians had a slightly lower mean DMFT (dental caries) score than nonvegetarians (mean difference -0.15, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.02; ungraded, mostly low-quality studies). Source: Abstract; Results (Dental caries); Figure 3A · same question in other reviews | MD -0.15 [-0.29, -0.02] | 4 studies | Ungraded |
Included primary studies 19
Open as a trial list| Study | Also included by | Outcomes it informs here | Trial PICO | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Diagn, Shaw & Smith 2001 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | Presence of dental erosion | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Al-Diaigan, Shaw & Smith 2001 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Chandra & Chawla 1979 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Chandra 1979 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Herman 2011 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | Presence of dental erosion | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Laffranchi 2010 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Laffranchi 2010 / Zotti 2014 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Linkosalo & Markkanen 1985 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | Presence of dental erosion | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Linkosalo 1988 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | Presence of dental erosion | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Pedrao 2018 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Rafeek 2006 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Rafeek 2006 / Smith 2008 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Rahmatulla & Guile 1990 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | PM31571246-P3-O1 | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Shah 2004 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Sherfudhin 1996 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | PM31571246-P3-O1 | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Smith 2008 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Staufenbiel 2013 / 2015 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Staufenbiel 2015 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Zotti 2014 matched by author and year (probable) | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |