Cochrane · systematic review · MR000047
Financial conflicts of interest in systematic reviews: associations with results, conclusions, and methodological quality
Hansen, C, Lundh, A, Rasmussen, K, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library
MethodologyAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
3
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 66.7%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Estimated treatment effect measured as Z‐scores*** after adjustment for the number of patients | no estimate extracted | NR | Very low |
Frequency of statistically favourable results | RR 0.84 [0.62, 1.14] | NR | Very low |
Frequency of favourable conclusions | RR 1.98 [1.26, 3.11] | NR | Low |