Cochrane · systematic review · CD014909

Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery

Willis, MA, Toews, I, Soltau, SLV, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

ColorectalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
15
current version
GRADE rated
15
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 6.7%Low 9 · 60%Moderate 5 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation versus mechanical bowel preparation alone

Population: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
SSI
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs mechanical bowel preparation alone
RR 0.56 [0.42, 0.74]16 studies · 3917 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Anastomotic leakage
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs mechanical bowel preparation alone
RR 0.6 [0.36, 0.99]10 studies · 2356 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Mortality
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs mechanical bowel preparation alone
RR 0.87 [0.27, 2.82]3 studies · 639 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Incidence of postoperative ileus
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs mechanical bowel preparation alone
RR 0.89 [0.59, 1.32]6 studies · 2013 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Length of hospital stay
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs mechanical bowel preparation alone
no estimate extracted3 studies · 621 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation versus oral antibiotics alone

Population: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Surgical site infections
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs oral antibiotics alone
RR 0.87 [0.34, 2.21]3 studies · 960 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Anastomotic leakage
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs oral antibiotics alone
RR 0.84 [0.21, 3.45]3 studies · 960 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Mortality
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs oral antibiotics alone
RR 1.02 [0.3, 3.5]2 studies · 709 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Incidence of postoperative ileus
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs oral antibiotics alone
RR 1.25 [0.68, 2.33]2 studies · 709 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Length of hospital stay
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs oral antibiotics alone
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation versus no bowel preparation

Population: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Surgical site infections
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs no bowel preparation
RR 0.63 [0.33, 1.23]1 study · 396 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Anastomotic leakage
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs no bowel preparation
RR 0.89 [0.33, 2.42]1 study · 396 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Mortality
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs no bowel preparation
RR 0.2 [0.01, 4.22]1 study · 396 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Incidence of postoperative ileus
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs no bowel preparation
RR 1.18 [0.77, 1.81]1 study · 396 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Length of hospital stay
Summary of findings table ‐ Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation vs no bowel preparation
no estimate extracted1 study · 396 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision