Cochrane · systematic review · CD014763

Purse‐string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal

Hajibandeh, S, Hajibandeh, S, Maw, A · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

ColorectalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 50%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 1 · 25%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table ‐ Purse‐string skin closure compared to linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal

Population: people undergoing stoma reversal
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Surgical site infection
Summary of findings table ‐ Purse‐string skin closure vs linear skin closure
OR 0.17 [0.09, 0.29]9 studies · 757 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Participant satisfaction (very satisfied or satisfied)
Summary of findings table ‐ Purse‐string skin closure vs linear skin closure
OR 20.11 [1.09, 369.88]2 studies · 122 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Incisional hernia
Summary of findings table ‐ Purse‐string skin closure vs linear skin closure
OR 0.51 [0.07, 3.7]4 studies · 297 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Operative time
Summary of findings table ‐ Purse‐string skin closure vs linear skin closure
no estimate extracted6 studies · 460 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency