Cochrane · systematic review · CD014717
Mobile health technologies to improve walking distance in people with intermittent claudication
Elfghi, M, Dunne, D, Jones, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library
VascularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
5
Included studies
NR
No studies 5 · 71.4%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Do mobile health technologies help improve walking distance in people with intermittent claudication?
Population: people with intermittent claudication
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Change in absolute walking distance from baseline (m) | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 503 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Change in claudication distance from baseline (m) | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Amputation‐free survival | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Revascularisation‐free survival | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) | RR 1.37 [0.07, 28.17] | 1 study · 305 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Major adverse limb events (MALE) | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Above‐ankle amputation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |