Cochrane · systematic review · CD013850

Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being

Silva, JA, Mininel, VA, Fernandes Agreli, H, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 40%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 30%Low 2 · 20%Moderate 1 · 10%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being compared with usual centralised and hierarchical leadership

Population: healthcare professionals
10 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Professional practice
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Leadership
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extracted3 studies · 955 participantsModerate
Team performance
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extracted1 study · 164 participantsLow
Clinical performance
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Health care outcomes
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Inpatient mortality
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Staff well‐being
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Work‐related stress Â
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extracted1 study · 164 participantsLow
Unintended consequences
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Staff absenceÂ
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well‐being vs usual centralised and hierarchical leadership
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low