Cochrane · systematic review · CD013506

Magnesium sulfate for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Ni, H, Aye, SZ, Naing, C · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
22
current version
GRADE rated
16
No studies
5
Included studies
NR
No studies 5 · 22.7%Ungraded 1 · 4.5%Very low 12 · 54.5%Low 4 · 18.2%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Intravenous magnesium sulfate + standard care compared to placebo + standard care for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Population: acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Proportion of people with hospital admissions (from the emergency room)
Intravenous magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
OR 0.45 [0.23, 0.88]3 studies · 170 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of people requiring non‐invasive ventilation
Intravenous magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
OR 0.74 [0.31, 1.75]2 studies · 107 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of people with serious adverse events
Intravenous magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted1 study · 77 participantsUngraded
Length of hospital stay
Intravenous magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 54 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Change in oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Intravenous magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted1 study · 77 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Change in dyspnoea score
Intravenous magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 101 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Lung function: FEV1 change from baseline at 60 min
Intravenous magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care compared to placebo + standard care for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Population: acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Proportion of people with hospital admissions (from the emergency room)
Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
OR 0.77 [0.21, 2.82]1 study · 109 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of people requiring ICU admission
Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
OR 0.39 [0.15, 1]2 studies · 281 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of people requiring ventilatory support (NIV or assisted ventilation)
Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
OR 0.33 [0.01, 8.2]1 study · 172 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of people with serious adverse events
Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Length of hospital stay
Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Change in oxygen saturation (SaO2)
Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Change in dyspnoea score
Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Lung function: FEV1 at 60 min
Nebulised magnesium sulfate + standard care vs placebo + standard care
no estimate extracted1 study · 109 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Magnesium sulfate compared to standard care (ipratropium bromide) for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Population: acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Proportion of people with hospital admissions (from the emergency room)
Magnesium sulfate vs standard care (ipratropium bromide)
OR 1.62 [0.78, 3.37]1 study · 124 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of people requiring endotracheal intubation
Magnesium sulfate vs standard care (ipratropium bromide)
OR 1.69 [0.61, 4.71]1 study · 124 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of people with serious adverse events
Magnesium sulfate vs standard care (ipratropium bromide)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Length of hospital stay
Magnesium sulfate vs standard care (ipratropium bromide)
no estimate extracted1 study · 124 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Change in oxygen saturation (SaO2)
Magnesium sulfate vs standard care (ipratropium bromide)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in dyspnoea score
Magnesium sulfate vs standard care (ipratropium bromide)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Lung function: FEV1 at 60 min
Magnesium sulfate vs standard care (ipratropium bromide)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies