Cochrane · systematic review · CD013489

Non‐pharmacological interventions for stuttering in children six years and younger

Sjøstrand, Å, Kefalianos, E, Hofslundsengen, H, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 4 · 66.7%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of Findings Table ‐ The Lidcombe Program compared to wait‐list control group for stuttering in children aged six years and younger (see footnotes a and b)

Population: children aged six years and younger who stutter
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stuttering frequency (% SS)
Summary of Findings Table ‐ The Lidcombe Program vs wait‐list control group
no estimate extracted4 studies · 151 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Stuttering severity
Summary of Findings Table ‐ The Lidcombe Program vs wait‐list control group
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Speech efficiency (syllables per second)
Summary of Findings Table ‐ The Lidcombe Program vs wait‐list control group
no estimate extracted1 study · 46 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Communication attitudes
Summary of Findings Table ‐ The Lidcombe Program vs wait‐list control group
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Impact of interventions for stuttering on emotional, cognitive and psychosocial domains, or quality of life
Summary of Findings Table ‐ The Lidcombe Program vs wait‐list control group
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Adverse effects
Summary of Findings Table ‐ The Lidcombe Program vs wait‐list control group
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded