Cochrane · systematic review · CD013485

Pulmonary rehabilitation versus usual care for adults with asthma

Osadnik, CR, Gleeson, C, McDonald, VM, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
9
current version
GRADE rated
8
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 11.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 44.4%Low 2 · 22.2%Moderate 2 · 22.2%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Pulmonary rehabilitation compared to usual care for adults with asthma

Population: Adults with asthma
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Exercise performance: peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) on cycle ergometer incremental CPET
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 129 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Exercise performance: % predicted VO2 max on incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 60 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Exercise performance: incremental shuttle walk test distance, metres
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Exercise performance: 6‐minute walk test distance, metres
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 529 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Asthma control: ACQ score
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 93 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Asthma control: ACT score
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 442 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life: AQLQ total score
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 442 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life: SGRQ total score
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 440 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies