Cochrane · systematic review · CD013384
Tailored or adapted interventions for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and at least one other long‐term condition: a mixed methods review
Dennett, EJ, Janjua, S, Stovold, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
7
Included studies
NR
No studies 7 · 50%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 21.4%Low 4 · 28.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Intervention compared to usual care for COPD and at least one other long‐term condition
Population: COPD and at least one other long‐term condition
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome domain Intervention vs usual care | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life ‐ SGRQ totalScale from: 0 to 100 (lower scores better) Â Intervention vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 70 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life ‐ CAT total Scale from 0 to 40 (lower scores better) Â Intervention vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 77 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Exacerbations ‐ number of people experiencing one or more  Intervention vs usual care | OR 1.09 [0.75, 1.57] | 1 study · 470 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Functional status‐6MWD (metres) Â Intervention vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 100 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
All‐cause hospital admissions ‐ people experiencing one or more  Intervention vs usual care | OR 0.91 [0.55, 1.5] | 1 study · 312 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
All‐cause mortality (deaths) Â Intervention vs usual care | OR 0.55 [0.23, 1.35] | 2 studies · 177 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Intervention compared to active comparison for COPD and at least one other long‐term condition
Population: COPD and at least one other long‐term condition
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcome domain Intervention vs active comparison | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life ‐ SGRQ total Intervention vs active comparison | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life ‐ CAT total Intervention vs active comparison | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Exacerbations Intervention vs active comparison | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Functional status ‐ 6MWD (metres) Intervention vs active comparison | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 30 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
All‐cause hospital admissions Intervention vs active comparison | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
All‐cause mortality Intervention vs active comparison | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |