Cochrane · systematic review · CD013276
Physiological track‐and‐trigger/early warning systems for use in maternity care
Smith, V, Kenny, LC, Sandall, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 4 · 57.1%Moderate 2 · 28.6%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
TTS/EWS compared to standard care in maternity care
Population: maternity care
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Maternal death TTS/EWS vs standard care | OR 0.8 [0.3, 2.11] | 1 study · 536233 participants | Moderate |
Haemorrhage TTS/EWS vs standard care | OR 0.36 [0.19, 0.69] | 1 study · 700 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Sepsis TTS/EWS vs standard care | OR 0.21 [0.02, 1.8] | 1 study · 700 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Eclampsia TTS/EWS vs standard care | OR 1.5 [0.74, 3.03] | 2 studies · 536933 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
HELLP count TTS/EWS vs standard care | OR 0.21 [0.01, 4.4] | 1 study · 700 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |
Maternal admission to ICU TTS/EWS vs standard care | OR 0.78 [0.53, 1.15] | 2 studies · 536933 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Perinatal death$ (neonatal death only; all women) TTS/EWS vs standard care | OR 1.06 [0.62, 1.84] | 1 study · 700 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |