Cochrane · systematic review · CD013035
Parathyroidectomy for adults with primary hyperparathyroidism
Pappachan, JM, Lahart, IM, Viswanath, AK, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library
Metabolic and Endocrine DisordersAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 50%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Parathyroidectomy compared to observation in adults with primary hyperparathyroidism
Population: people with primary hyperparathyroidism
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Cure of PHPT Parathyroidectomy vs observation | RR 0.04 [0.02, 0.08] | 8 studies · 333 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Morbidity related to PHPT Parathyroidectomy vs observation | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 287 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Serious adverse events Parathyroidectomy vs observation | 3.35 [0.14, 78.6] | 4 studies · 168 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
All‐cause mortality Parathyroidectomy vs observation | 2.11 [0.2, 22.6] | 2 studies · 133 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Health‐related quality of life Parathyroidectomy vs observation | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 195 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Hospitalisation for hypercalcaemia, renal impairment or pancreatitis Parathyroidectomy vs observation | RR 0.91 [0.2, 4.25] | 6 studies · 287 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |