Cochrane · systematic review · CD012573
Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption
Hollands, GJ, Carter, P, Anwer, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 3 · 75%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlyLower versus higher availability (i.e. fewer versus more options) of food products for changing quantity of food selected or consumed
Population: Adults and children
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Selection Lower vs higher availability (i.e. fewer versus more options) of food products | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 154 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Consumption Lower vs higher availability (i.e. fewer versus more options) of food products | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 150 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Lower versus higher proximity (i.e. placed farther away versus placed nearer) of food products for changing quantity of food selected or consumed
Population: Adults and children
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Selection Lower vs higher proximity (i.e. placed farther away versus placed nearer) of food products | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 41 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Consumption Lower vs higher proximity (i.e. placed farther away versus placed nearer) of food products | no estimate extracted | 12 studies · 1098 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Lower versus higher availability (i.e. fewer versus more options) of food products for changing quantity of food selected or consumed
Population: Adults and children
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Selection Lower vs higher availability (i.e. fewer versus more options) of food products | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 154 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Consumption Lower vs higher availability (i.e. fewer versus more options) of food products | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 150 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Lower versus higher proximity (i.e. placed farther away versus placed nearer) of food products for changing quantity of food selected or consumed
Population: Adults and children
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Selection Lower vs higher proximity (i.e. placed farther away versus placed nearer) of food products | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 41 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Consumption Lower vs higher proximity (i.e. placed farther away versus placed nearer) of food products | no estimate extracted | 12 studies · 1098 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |