Cochrane · systematic review · CD012527
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals
Kunzler, AM, Helmreich, I, Chmitorz, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library
Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning ProblemsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Resilience interventions compared to control condition for healthcare professionals
Population: healthcare professionals including healthcare staff delivering direct medical care (e.g. nurses, physicians, hospital personnel) and allied healthcare staff (e.g. social workers, psychologists); aged 18 years and older, irrespective of health status
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Resilience Measured by: investigators measured resilience using different instruments; higher scores mean higher resilience Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention Resilience interventions vs control condition | no estimate extracted | 12 studies · 690 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Mental health and well‐being: anxiety Measured by: investigators measured anxiety using different instruments; lower scores mean lower anxiety Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention Resilience interventions vs control condition | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 231 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Mental health and well‐being: depression Measured by: investigators measured depression using different instruments; lower scores mean lower depression Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention Resilience interventions vs control condition | no estimate extracted | 14 studies · 788 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Mental health and well‐being: stress or stress perceptionMeasured by: investigators measured stress or stress perception using different instruments; lower scores mean lower stress or stress perception Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention Resilience interventions vs control condition | no estimate extracted | 17 studies · 997 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Mental health and well‐being: well‐being or quality of life Measured by: investigators measured well‐being or quality of life using different instruments; higher scores mean higher well‐being or quality of life Timing of outcome assessment: post‐i... Resilience interventions vs control condition | no estimate extracted | 13 studies · 1494 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Adverse events Resilience interventions vs control condition | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 784 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness |