Cochrane · systematic review · CD012330
Shared decision‐making for people with asthma
Kew, KM, Malik, P, Aniruddhan, K, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 33.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 3 · 50%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Shared decision‐making compared with usual care for people with asthma
Population: adults and children with asthma
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Asthma‐related quality of life ( Shared decision‐making vs usual care | OR 1.9 [1.24, 2.91] | 1 study · 371 participants | Moderate |
Parent/patient satisfaction Shared decision‐making vs usual care | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Medication adherence ( Shared decision‐making vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 371 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness |
Exacerbations of asthma ( Shared decision‐making vs usual care | OR 0.29 [0.05, 1.6] | 1 study · 53 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness |
Asthma control ( Shared decision‐making vs usual care | OR 1.9 [1.26, 2.87] | 1 study · 371 participants | Moderate |
Adverse events (all) Shared decision‐making vs usual care | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |