Cochrane · systematic review · CD011867
Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta‐analysis
Suijkerbuijk, YB, Schaafsma, FG, van Mechelen, JC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
WorkAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 20%Low 6 · 60%Moderate 2 · 20%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings of network meta‐analysis
Population: adults with severe mental illness
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Augmented supported employment vs. psychiatric care only | RR 3.81 [1.99, 7.31] | 1 study · 256 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Supported employment vs. psychiatric care only | RR 2.72 [1.55, 4.76] | 1 study · 2238 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Pre‐vocational training vs. psychiatric care only | RR 1.26 [0.73, 2.19] | 2 studies · 161 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Transitional employment vs. psychiatric care only | RR 1 [0.51, 1.96] | 0 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Augmented supported employment vs. transitional employment | RR 3.79 [2.34, 6.14] | 2 studies · 212 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Supported employment vs. transitional employment | RR 2.71 [1.8, 4.06] | 4 studies · 87 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Pre‐vocational training vs. transitional employment | RR 1.26 [0.77, 2.05] | 0 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Augmented supported employment vs. pre‐vocational training | RR 3.02 [1.88, 4.87] | 2 studies · 193 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Supported employment vs prevocational training | RR 2.16 [1.59, 2.93] | 9 studies · 1569 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Augmented supported employment vs supported employment only | RR 1.4 [0.92, 2.14] | 3 studies · 205 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |