Cochrane · systematic review · CD011716
Ambulatory and short‐burst oxygen for interstitial lung disease
Sharp, C, Adamali, H, Millar, AB · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Ambulatory oxygen versus air in interstitial lung disease
Population: people with ILD
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
6‐minute walk test distance (6MWT) (m) Ambulatory oxygen vs air | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 20 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness |
Endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) (m) Ambulatory oxygen vs air | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 6 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness |
Dyspnoea (modified Borg score) Higher scores show worse dyspnoea. Ambulatory oxygen vs air | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 20 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness |
Endurance time on constant load ergometry (s) Ambulatory oxygen vs air | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 72 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness |