Cochrane · systematic review · CD011690

Short‐acting erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents for anaemia in predialysis patients

Hahn, D, Esezobor, CI, Elserafy, N, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Kidney and TransplantAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
18
current version
GRADE rated
18
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 11.1%Low 12 · 66.7%Moderate 4 · 22.2%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Epoetin alpha every 2 weeks versus to weekly for anaemia in CKD patients not receiving dialysis

Population: anaemia in predialysis patients
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in Hb level
Epoetin alpha every 2 weeks vs to weekly
no estimate extracted4 studies · 798 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Number reaching target Hb
Epoetin alpha every 2 weeks vs to weekly
RR 0.96 [0.93, 0.99]4 studies · 798 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Number of deaths
Epoetin alpha every 2 weeks vs to weekly
RR 0.89 [0.38, 2.07]4 studies · 838 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: RBC transfusions
Epoetin alpha every 2 weeks vs to weekly
RR 1.56 [0.71, 3.45]3 studies · 580 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events: hypertension
Epoetin alpha every 2 weeks vs to weekly
RR 0.85 [0.55, 1.32]4 studies · 838 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: thrombovascular events
Epoetin alpha every 2 weeks vs to weekly
RR 1.41 [0.67, 3]4 studies · 838 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Epoetin alfa every four weeks versus with every two weeks in CKD patients not receiving dialysis

Population: anaemia in predialysis patients
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in Hb level
Epoetin alfa every four weeks vs with every two weeks
no estimate extracted3 studies · 671 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Number reaching target Hb
Epoetin alfa every four weeks vs with every two weeks
RR 0.95 [0.84, 1.07]3 studies · 687 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Number of deaths
Epoetin alfa every four weeks vs with every two weeks
RR 0.95 [0.33, 2.75]3 studies · 724 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: RBC transfusions
Epoetin alfa every four weeks vs with every two weeks
RR 1.26 [0.53, 2.98]2 studies · 470 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: hypertension
Epoetin alfa every four weeks vs with every two weeks
RR 1.02 [0.62, 1.69]3 studies · 724 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: arteriovenous complications
Epoetin alfa every four weeks vs with every two weeks
RR 1.02 [0.39, 2.68]3 studies · 724 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Epoetin theta versus epoetin beta in CKD patients not receiving dialysis

Population: anaemia in predialysis patients
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Final Hb
Epoetin theta vs epoetin beta
no estimate extracted1 study · 288 participantsModerate
Downgraded: indirectness
Mean weekly epoetin dose
Epoetin theta vs epoetin beta
no estimate extracted1 study · 288 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Deaths
Epoetin theta vs epoetin beta
RR 2.46 [0.29, 20.77]1 study · 288 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events: hypertension
Epoetin theta vs epoetin beta
RR 0.35 [0.11, 1.08]1 study · 288 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events: RBC transfusions
Epoetin theta vs epoetin beta
RR 1.48 [0.06, 36.1]1 study · 288 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events: discontinuation of therapy
Epoetin theta vs epoetin beta
RR 1.77 [0.68, 4.63]1 study · 288 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness