Cochrane · systematic review · CD011646

Pharmacological interventions for alcoholic liver disease (alcohol‐related liver disease)

Buzzetti, E, Kalafateli, M, Thorburn, D, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
55
current version
GRADE rated
21
No studies
34
Included studies
NR
No studies 34 · 61.8%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 20 · 36.4%Low 1 · 1.8%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Glucocorticosteroids compared with no intervention for alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)

Population: participants with alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
OR 0.85 [0.67, 1.08]12 studies · 1147 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
OR 1 [0.71, 1.39]4 studies · 672 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
OR 1.37 [0.98, 1.93]1 study · 546 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (number)
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Pentoxifylline compared with no intervention for alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)

Population: participants with alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
OR 0.77 [0.58, 1.02]6 studies · 881 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
OR 1.18 [0.81, 1.74]1 study · 545 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
OR 1.07 [0.76, 1.51]1 study · 545 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (number)
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Colchicine compared with no intervention for alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)

Population: participants with alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Colchicine vs no intervention
OR 1.31 [0.47, 3.64]2 studies · 139 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Colchicine vs no intervention
OR 3.18 [0.13, 81.01]1 study · 69 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Colchicine vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (number)
Colchicine vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Colchicine vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Insulin plus glucagon compared with no intervention for alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)

Population: participants with alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Insulin plus glucagon vs no intervention
OR 1.14 [0.69, 1.9]5 studies · 265 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Insulin plus glucagon vs no intervention
OR 2.57 [0.92, 7.15]1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Insulin plus glucagon vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (number)
Insulin plus glucagon vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Insulin plus glucagon vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Propylthiouracil compared with no intervention for alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)

Population: participants with alcoholic hepatitis (all severity)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
OR 1.16 [0.5, 2.72]2 studies · 108 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (number)
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Glucocorticosteroids compared with no intervention for severe alcoholic hepatitis

Population: participants with severe alcoholic hepatitis
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
OR 0.88 [0.63, 1.21]2 studies · 607 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
OR 1.01 [0.71, 1.43]2 studies · 607 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
OR 1.37 [0.98, 1.93]1 study · 546 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (number)
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Glucocorticosteroids vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Pentoxifylline compared with no intervention for severe alcoholic hepatitis

Population: participants with severe alcoholic hepatitis
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
OR 0.8 [0.59, 1.07]4 studies · 726 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
OR 1.18 [0.81, 1.74]1 study · 545 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
OR 1.07 [0.76, 1.51]1 study · 545 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events (number)
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Pentoxifylline vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Anabolic steroids compared with no intervention for alcohol‐related disorders (others)

Population: alcohol‐related disorders (others)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Anabolic steroids vs no intervention
OR 1.29 [0.7, 2.39]2 studies · 248 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Anabolic steroids vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Anabolic steroids vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (number)
Anabolic steroids vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Anabolic steroids vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Antioxidants compared with no intervention for alcohol‐related disorders (others)

Population: alcohol‐related disorders (others)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Antioxidants vs no intervention
OR 1.96 [0.99, 3.89]2 studies · 255 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Antioxidants vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Antioxidants vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (number)
Antioxidants vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Antioxidants vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Colchicine compared with no intervention for alcohol‐related disorders (others)

Population: alcohol‐related disorders (others)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Colchicine vs no intervention
OR 1.11 [0.8, 1.53]2 studies · 604 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Colchicine vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Colchicine vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (number)
Colchicine vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Colchicine vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Propylthiouracil compared with no intervention for alcohol‐related disorders (others)

Population: alcohol‐related disorders (others)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at maximal
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
OR 0.45 [0.26, 0.78]2 studies · 423 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days)
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (proportion)
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events (number)
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Propylthiouracil vs no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies