Cochrane · systematic review · CD011589
Routine provision of feedback from patient‐reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice
Gibbons, C, Porter, I, Gonçalves-Bradley, DC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
Effective Practice and Organisation of CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 37.5%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 12.5%Moderate 4 · 50%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
PROM feedback compared to usual care for improve processes and outcomes of care
Population: ambulatory adult patients.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Quality of life PROM feedback vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 2687 participants | Moderate |
General health perceptions PROM feedback vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 552 participants | Low |
Functioning PROM feedback vs usual care | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Symptoms PROM feedback vs usual care | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Patient‐physician communication PROM feedback vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 658 participants | Moderate |
Diagnosis and notation PROM feedback vs usual care | RR 1.73 [1.44, 2.08] | 7223 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Disease control PROM feedback vs usual care | RR 1.25 [1.1, 1.41] | 2806 participants | Moderate |
Adverse effects PROM feedback vs usual care | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |