Cochrane · systematic review · CD011512
Government regulation of private health insurance
Motaze, NV, Chi, PC, Ongolo-Zogo, P, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
Effective Practice and Organisation of CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 37.5%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 62.5%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings
Population: adultswith private health insurance cover
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Utilisation of healthcare services – breast cancer screening | no estimate extracted | 1260219 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Utilisation of healthcare services – colorectal cancer screening | no estimate extracted | 1183010 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Utilisation of healthcare services – cervical cancer screening | no estimate extracted | 842911 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Utilisation of healthcare services – prostate cancer screening | no estimate extracted | 13314 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of health care provided | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Cost of health care provided | no estimate extracted | 91583 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Patient outcomes | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse effects | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |