Cochrane · systematic review · CD011482
Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome
van Gruting, IM A, Stankiewicz, A, Thakar, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
ColorectalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
18
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
6
Included studies
NR
No studies 6 · 33.3%Ungraded 1 · 5.6%Very low 1 · 5.6%Low 4 · 22.2%Moderate 0 · 0%High 6 · 33.3%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings: Diagnostic test accuracy of imaging for diagnosis of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with ODS
Population: 1
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Test | no estimate extracted | 5 participants | Ungraded |
Rectocele | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
EP | no estimate extracted | 34 studies · 1737 participants | High |
MRI | no estimate extracted | 19 studies · 659 participants | High |
TPUS | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 988 participants | High |
EVUS | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 454 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
DAE | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 99 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
EDF | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 169 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Enterocele | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Intussusception | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Anismus | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
EFD | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 169 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
PFD | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Risk of bias (QUADAS‐2) | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 8 participants | High |
Applicability (QUADAS‐2) | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Heterogeneity | no estimate extracted | NR | High |
Sensitivity analysis | no estimate extracted | 2010 participants | High |
Conclusion | no estimate extracted | NR | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |