Cochrane · systematic review · CD011128

Pharmacological treatment for antipsychotic‐related constipation

Every‐Palmer, S, Newton‐Howes, G, Clarke, MJ · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
35
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
29
Included studies
NR
No studies 29 · 82.9%Ungraded 1 · 2.9%Very low 5 · 14.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Glycerol laxative versus tuina massage for antipsychotic‐related constipation

Population: antipsychotic‐related constipation
12 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Global or clinical change in constipation (a) as defined by the study Still constipated (no defecation) at 2 days
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
RR 2.88 [1.89, 4.39]1 study · 120 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Global or clinical change in constipation (a) as defined by the study Still constipated (no defecation) at 3 days
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
RR 4.8 [1.96, 11.74]1 study · 120 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
(b) Change in the frequency of defecation
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(c) Change in straining at defecation
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(d) Change in the frequency of lumpy or hard stools
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(e) Change in the frequency of manual manoeuvres to facilitate defecation
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Need for rescue medication
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Presence of antipsychotic‐related constipation complications such as bowel obstruction
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life (changed to any extent)
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Leaving the study early
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Economic costs
Glycerol laxative vs tuina massage
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Glycerol laxative versus acupuncture for antipsychotic‐related constipation

Population: antipsychotic‐related constipation
12 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Global or clinical change in constipation (a) as defined by the study Still constipated (no defecation) at 2 days
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
RR 3.5 [2.18, 5.62]1 study · 120 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Still constipated (no defecation) at 3 days
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
RR 8 [2.54, 25.16]1 study · 120 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
(b) Change in the frequency of defecation
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(c) Change in straining at defecation
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(d) Change in the frequency of lumpy or hard stools
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(e) Change in the frequency of manual manoeuvres to facilitate defecation
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Need for rescue medication
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Presence of antipsychotic‐related constipation complications such as bowel obstruction
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life (changed to any extent)
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Leaving the study early
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Economic costs
Glycerol laxative vs acupuncture
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Mannitol versus phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda for antipsychotic‐related constipation

Population: antipsychotic‐related constipation
11 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Global or clinical change in constipation as defined by the study a) Still constipated (no defecation) at 24 hours
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
RR 0.07 [0.02, 0.27]1 study · 240 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
(b) Change in the frequency of defecation
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(c) Change in straining at defecation
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(d) Change in the frequency of lumpy or hard stools
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(e) Change in the frequency of manual manoeuvres to facilitate defecation
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Need for rescue medication
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Presence of antipsychotic‐related constipation complications such as bowel obstruction
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life (changed to any extent)
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extracted1 study · 240 participantsUngraded
Leaving the study early
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Economic costs
Mannitol vs phenolphthalein or rhubarb soda
no estimate extractedNRNo studies