Cochrane · systematic review · CD011045
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco
Hollands, GJ, Shemilt, I, Marteau, TM, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
Public HealthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
24
current version
GRADE rated
13
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 11 · 45.8%Very low 2 · 8.3%Low 6 · 25%Moderate 5 · 20.8%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Food: Larger versus smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware for changing quantity consumed or selected
Population: children and adults
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Consumption Food: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 6603 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
‐ Consumption among children Food: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 1421 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
‐ Consumption among adults Food: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 5182 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Selection without purchase Food: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 1164 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
‐ Selection without purchase among children Food: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 382 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
‐ Selection without purchase among adults Food: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 782 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Alcohol: Larger versus smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware for changing quantity consumed or selected
Population: children and adults
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Consumption Alcohol: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
‐ Consumption among children Alcohol: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
‐ Consumption among adults Alcohol: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Selection with or without purchase Alcohol: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
‐ Selection with or without purchase among children Alcohol: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
‐ Selection with or without purchase among adults Alcohol: Larger vs smaller‐sized portions, packages or tableware | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Tobacco: Longer versus shorter cigarettes for changing quantity consumed or selected
Population: children and adults
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Consumption Tobacco: Longer vs shorter cigarettes | no estimate extracted | 108 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
‐ Consumption among children Tobacco: Longer vs shorter cigarettes | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
‐ Consumption among adults Tobacco: Longer vs shorter cigarettes | no estimate extracted | 108 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Selection with or without purchase Tobacco: Longer vs shorter cigarettes | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
‐ Selection with or without purchase among children Tobacco: Longer vs shorter cigarettes | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
‐ Selection with or without purchase among adults Tobacco: Longer vs shorter cigarettes | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Food: Shorter, wider versus taller, narrower glasses or plastic bottles (shape) for changing quantity of non‐alcoholic beverages consumed or selected
Population: children and adults
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Consumption Food: Shorter, wider vs taller, narrower glasses or plastic bottles (shape) | no estimate extracted | 50 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
‐ Consumption among adults Food: Shorter, wider vs taller, narrower glasses or plastic bottles (shape) | no estimate extracted | 50 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
‐ Consumption among children Food: Shorter, wider vs taller, narrower glasses or plastic bottles (shape) | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Selection without purchase Food: Shorter, wider vs taller, narrower glasses or plastic bottles (shape) | no estimate extracted | 232 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
‐ Selection without purchase among children Food: Shorter, wider vs taller, narrower glasses or plastic bottles (shape) | no estimate extracted | 96 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
‐ Selection without purchase among adults Food: Shorter, wider vs taller, narrower glasses or plastic bottles (shape) | no estimate extracted | 136 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |