Cochrane · systematic review · CD010971

Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood

Abbott, RA, Martin, AE, Newlove‐Delgado, TV, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
12
current version
GRADE rated
12
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 25%Low 9 · 75%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Cognitive behavioural therapy compared with control for children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain

Population: children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment success: postintervention
Cognitive behavioural therapy vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 175 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Treatment success: medium‐term
Cognitive behavioural therapy vs control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 139 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Pain intensity: postintervention Lower score equals less pain.
Cognitive behavioural therapy vs control
no estimate extracted7 studies · 405 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Pain intensity: medium‐term
Cognitive behavioural therapy vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 301 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
QOL (physical subscale): postintervention Higher score equals better QOL.
Cognitive behavioural therapy vs control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 136 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
QOL (psychosocial subscale): postintervention Higher score equals better QOL.
Cognitive behavioural therapy vs control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 136 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Functional disability or activity limitations: postintervention Lower score equals less activity disability.
Cognitive behavioural therapy vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 176 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Hypnotherapy compared with control for children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain

Population: children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment success: postintervention
Hypnotherapy vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 146 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain intensity: postintervention Lower score equals less pain.
Hypnotherapy vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 146 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain frequency: postintervention Lower score equals less pain.
Hypnotherapy vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 146 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Yoga compared with control for children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain

Population: children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain intensity: postintervention Lower score equals less pain.
Yoga vs control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 122 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Functional disability: postintervention Lower score equals less functional disability.
Yoga vs control
no estimate extracted2 studies · 53 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias