Cochrane · systematic review · CD010905
Human resource management training of supervisors for improving health and well‐being of employees
Kuehnl, A, Seubert, C, Rehfuess, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library
WorkAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
16
current version
GRADE rated
16
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 13 · 81.3%Low 3 · 18.8%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Training compared to no intervention in supervisors
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Stress Lower score better Short‐term cRCT Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 157 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Stress Lower score better Mid‐term cRCT Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 304 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Stress Lower score better Mid‐term CBA Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 368 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Stress Lower score better Long‐term CBA Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 145 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Absenteeism Lower score better Mid‐term cRCT Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 164 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Well‐being Higher score better Short‐term cRCT Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 337 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Well‐being Higher score better Short‐term CBA Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 143 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Well‐being Higher score better Mid‐term cRCT + RCT On the job/interaction training Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 77 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Well‐being Higher score better Mid‐term cRCT + RCT Off the job/interaction training Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 601 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Well‐being Higher score better Mid‐term CBA Off the job/interaction training Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 744 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Well‐being Higher score better Mid‐term CBA On the job/environment training Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 129 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Well‐being Higher score better Long‐term cRCT Training vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 547 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Training compared to placebo in supervisors
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Stress Lower score better; Mid‐term; cRCT Training vs placebo | no estimate extracted | 357 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Absenteeism Lower score better; Mid‐term cRCT Training vs placebo | no estimate extracted | 174 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Well‐being Higher score better; Mid‐term CBA Training vs placebo | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 57 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Training compared to other training in supervisors
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Stress Lower score better; Long‐term cRCT Training vs other training | no estimate extracted | 98 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |