Cochrane · systematic review · CD010705

GenoType® MTBDRsl assay for resistance to second‐line anti‐tuberculosis drugs

Theron, G, Peter, J, Richardson, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Infectious Diseases2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
15
current version
GRADE rated
12
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 20%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 26.7%Moderate 6 · 40%High 2 · 13.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

MTBDRsl for FQ resistance, direct testing on smear‐positive specimens

5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Test result
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
True positives (patients correctly diagnosed with FQ resistance)
no estimate extracted9 studies · 519 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having FQ resistance)
no estimate extracted9 studies · 519 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
True negatives (patients correctly classified as not having FQ resistance)
no estimate extracted9 studies · 1252 participantsHigh
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having FQ resistance)
no estimate extracted9 studies · 1252 participantsHigh

MTBDRsl for SLID resistance, direct testing on smear‐positive specimens

5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Test result
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
True positives (patients correctly diagnosed with SLID resistance)
no estimate extracted8 studies · 348 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having SLID resistance)
no estimate extracted8 studies · 348 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
True negatives (patients correctly classified as not having SLID resistance)
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1291 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having SLID resistance)
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1291 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

MTBDRsl for XDR‐TB, direct testing on smear‐positive specimens

5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Test result
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
True positives (patients correctly diagnosed with XDR‐TB)
no estimate extracted6 studies · 143 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having XDR‐TB)
no estimate extracted6 studies · 143 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
True negatives (patients correctly classified as not having XDR‐TB)
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1277 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having XDR‐TB)
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1277 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness