Cochrane · systematic review · CD010638

Oral and sublingual immunotherapy for egg allergy

Romantsik, O, Tosca, MA, Zappettini, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

Tobacco Addiction2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Oral and sublingual immunotherapy versus no therapy for egg allergy

Population: children with egg allergy
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Increase in the amount of egg that could be tolerated
Oral and sublingual immunotherapy vs no therapy
RR 7.48 [4.91, 11.38]9 studies · 410 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Complete recovery
Oral and sublingual immunotherapy vs no therapy
RR 4.25 [2.77, 6.53]10 studies · 439 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Numbers of children with serious adverse events
Oral and sublingual immunotherapy vs no therapy
no estimate extracted10 studies · 439 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Number of children with mild‐to‐severe adverse events
Oral and sublingual immunotherapy vs no therapy
RR 8.35 [5.31, 13.12]10 studies · 439 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision