Cochrane · systematic review · CD010041
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision‐making about mode of birth after a caesarean
Horey, D, Kealy, M, Davey, MA, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 20%High 4 · 80%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: women deciding about mode of birth in a pregnancy after caesarean birth
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Planned or preferred mode of birth: VBAC | RR 1.03 [0.97, 1.1] | 3 studies · 2071 participants | High |
Planned mode of birth: unsure | RR 0.87 [0.62, 1.2] | 3 studies · 2071 participants | High |
Adverse outcomes1 | no estimate extracted | NR | Moderate |
Congruence between preferred and actual mode of birth | RR 1.02 [0.96, 1.07] | 3 studies · 1921 participants | High |
Actual mode of birth (VBAC versus caesarean) | RR 0.97 [0.89, 1.06] | 3 studies · 2190 participants | High |