Cochrane · systematic review · CD009900

Pharmacological treatments for preventing epilepsy following traumatic head injury

Thompson, K, Pohlmann‐Eden, B, Campbell, LA, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

EpilepsyAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
15
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 5 · 33.3%Very low 2 · 13.3%Low 4 · 26.7%Moderate 2 · 13.3%High 2 · 13.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Antiepileptic drugs compared with placebo or standard care for people at risk of epilepsy following traumatic head injury

Population: people with traumatic head injuries
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Early seizures Count of events
Antiepileptic drugs vs placebo or standard care
RR 0.42 [0.23, 0.74]5 studies · 987 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Late seizures Count of events
Antiepileptic drugs vs placebo or standard care
RR 0.91 [0.57, 1.46]6 studies · 1029 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
All‐cause mortality
Antiepileptic drugs vs placebo or standard care
RR 1.08 [0.79, 1.46]5 studies · 1065 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Any serious adverse event of treatment count of events
Antiepileptic drugs vs placebo or standard care
RR 1.63 [0.73, 3.66]2 studies · 568 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Time to first seizure from randomization
Antiepileptic drugs vs placebo or standard care
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded

Neuroprotective agent versus placebo for people at risk of epilepsy following traumatic head injury

Population: people with traumatic head injuries
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Early seizure Count of events
Neuroprotective agent vs placebo
RR 2.99 [0.12, 73]1 study · 499 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Late seizure Count of events
Neuroprotective agent vs placebo
RR 1.07 [0.53, 2.17]1 study · 498 participantsHigh
All‐cause mortality
Neuroprotective agent vs placebo
RR 1.2 [0.8, 1.81]1 study · 466 participantsHigh
Any serious adverse event of treatment
Neuroprotective agent vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Time to first seizure from randomization
Neuroprotective agent vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded

Anti‐epileptic drugs compared to other anti‐epileptic drugs for people at risk of epilepsy following traumatic head injury

Population: people with traumatic head injuries
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Early seizure Counts of events
Anti‐epileptic drugs vs other anti‐epileptic drugs
RR 0.66 [0.2, 2.12]2 studies · 431 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Late seizure Counts of events
Anti‐epileptic drugs vs other anti‐epileptic drugs
RR 0.77 [0.46, 1.3]2 studies · 378 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
All‐cause mortality
Anti‐epileptic drugs vs other anti‐epileptic drugs
RR 0.53 [0.3, 94]2 studies · 431 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Any serious adverse event of treatment
Anti‐epileptic drugs vs other anti‐epileptic drugs
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Time to first seizure from randomization
Anti‐epileptic drugs vs other anti‐epileptic drugs
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded