Cochrane · systematic review · CD009863
Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy
Hafner, S, Zolk, K, Radaelli, F, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
ColorectalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 3 · 75%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Primary outcomes
Population: Participants with colonoscopy
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Cecal intubation rate (intention‐to‐treat analysis) | RR 1 [0.97, 1.03] | 16 studies · 2933 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Adenoma detection rate (endoscopists with all levels of experience) | RR 1.16 [1.04, 1.3] | 12 studies · 2457 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Adenoma detection rate (experienced endoscopists only) | RR 1.17 [1.05, 1.32] | 12 studies · 2200 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Number of adenomas per participant | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 902 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |