Cochrane · systematic review · CD009841

Potentiators (specific therapies for class III and IV mutations) for cystic fibrosis

Skilton, M, Krishan, A, Patel, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
21
current version
GRADE rated
14
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 19%Ungraded 3 · 14.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 19%Moderate 10 · 47.6%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor compared with placebo for cystic fibrosis with the F508del CFTR mutation

Population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and with the F508del CFTR mutation
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Survival
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 140 participantsUngraded
QoL Total score
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
QoL (CFQ‐R) Respiratory domain
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 140 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1 % predicted Relative change from baseline
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 140 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1 % predicted Absolute change from baseline
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 140 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 140 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to first pulmonary exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor compared with placebo for cystic fibrosis with at least one G551D CFTR mutation

Population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and with at least one G551D CFTR mutation
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Survival
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted3 studies · 238 participantsUngraded
QoL Total score
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
QoL (CFQ‐R) Respiratory domain
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted3 studies · 222 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
FEV1 % predicted Relative change from baseline
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted3 studies · 232 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
FEV1 L and % predicted Absolute change from baseline
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted3 studies · 232 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted3 studies · 232 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Time to first pulmonary exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
HR 0.46 [0.29, 0.73]1 study · 161 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor compared with placebo for cystic fibrosis with at least one R117H CFTR mutation

Population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and with at least one R117H CFTR mutation
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Survival
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 69 participantsUngraded
QoL Total score
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
QoL (CFQ‐R) Respiratory domain
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 69 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1 % predicted Relative change from baseline
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 69 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1 L and % predicted Absolute change from baseline
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 69 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 69 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to first pulmonary exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ ivacaftor vs placebo
HR 0.93 [0.42, 2.08]1 study · 69 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision