Cochrane · systematic review · CD009772

Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Debieux, P, Franciozi, CES, Lenza, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Bone, Joint and Muscle TraumaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Population: Adults undergoing surgical reconstruction of a ruptured ACL1
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Function: Lysholm knee score (0 to 100; higher scores = better function)
Bioabsorbable vs metallic interference screws
no estimate extracted3 studies · 168 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Function: Lysholm knee score (0 to 100; higher scores = better function)
Bioabsorbable vs metallic interference screws
no estimate extracted3 studies · 113 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Function: Lysholm knee score (0 to 100; higher scores = better function)
Bioabsorbable vs metallic interference screws
no estimate extracted2 studies · 71 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Overall treatment failure ‐ Intraoperative and postoperative complications5
Bioabsorbable vs metallic interference screws
RR 1.94 [1.29, 2.93]11 studies · 885 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Overall treatment failure ‐ Postoperative complications7
Bioabsorbable vs metallic interference screws
RR 1.44 [0.93, 2.23]11 studies · 885 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Activity level: Tegner score ( 0 to 10; higher scores = greater activity)
Bioabsorbable vs metallic interference screws
no estimate extracted2 studies · 122 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Activity level: Tegner score ( 0 to 10; higher scores = greater activity)
Bioabsorbable vs metallic interference screws
no estimate extracted2 studies · 72 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision