Cochrane · systematic review · CD009748
Motivational interviewing for improving outcomes in youth living with HIV
Mbuagbaw, L, Ye, C, Thabane, L · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library
HIV/AIDSAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 42.9%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 4 · 57.1%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Motivational interviewing versus control for Improving outcomes in youth living with HIV
Population: patients with Improving outcomes in youth living with HIV
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Adherence ‐ not measured Motivational interviewing vs control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Mortality ‐ not measured Motivational interviewing vs control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life ‐ not measured Motivational interviewing vs control | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Log 10 Viral load at 6 months Motivational interviewing vs control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 157 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Retention in care Number attending last Motivational interviewing vs control | OR 1.25 [0.69, 2.26] | 1 study · 188 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Drug abuse Self reported use of marijuana Motivational interviewing vs control | OR 1.23 [0.57, 2.63] | 1 study · 143 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Alcohol abuse Self reported alcohol use Motivational interviewing vs control | OR 0.58 [0.3, 1.12] | 1 study · 143 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |