Cochrane · systematic review · CD009736

Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials

Gillies, K, Cotton, SC, Brehaut, JC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

Consumers and CommunicationAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 57.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 42.9%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Decision aids for informed consent versus standard informed consent for people considering taking part in clinical trials

Population: people considering taking part in clinical trials
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Knowledge Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC)
Decision aids for informed consent vs standard informed consent
no estimate extracted2 studies · 146 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Accurate risk perception
Decision aids for informed consent vs standard informed consent
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Values based decision
Decision aids for informed consent vs standard informed consent
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Recognition that a decision needs to be made
Decision aids for informed consent vs standard informed consent
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Involvement in decision
Decision aids for informed consent vs standard informed consent
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Decisional conflict Decision Conflict Scale
Decision aids for informed consent vs standard informed consent
no estimate extracted2 studies · 146 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Decisional regret Decision Regret Scale
Decision aids for informed consent vs standard informed consent
no estimate extracted2 studies · 119 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias